mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   Hardware (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   New Sandy Bridge Computer Help (Built - WOW!) (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=14644)

em99010pepe 2011-01-31 13:36

[QUOTE=mdettweiler;250554]
Now I'm definitely reconsidering some earlier statements I made elsewhere on the forum that a Sandy Bridge i5 < an AMD Phenom II X6 in terms of total throughput. That may be the case for GIMPS (and other large-FFT work) but not so for NPLB and the like.[/QUOTE]

I told you so...you don't believe me...lol The core i5 750@3.6GHz easily beats an overclocked X6. Paul with his overclocked X6 was making the same LLR time as my overclocked Q6600 at the same n range, the core i5@3.6 GHz is 40 % faster than the Q6600@2.8 GHz! This difference increases with n size.

frmky 2011-01-31 18:01

This sucks: [URL="http://techreport.com/discussions.x/20326"]http://techreport.com/discussions.x/20326[/URL]

Flatlander 2011-01-31 18:15

[QUOTE=frmky;250649]This sucks: [URL="http://techreport.com/discussions.x/20326"]http://techreport.com/discussions.x/20326[/URL][/QUOTE]
Yep. :cry:
[QUOTE]The two 6Gbps SATA ports aren't at risk.[/QUOTE]
Phew! My HD is running from one of them and has no other drives. Maybe one more in the future.

Christenson 2011-02-01 04:12

There's a reason they call it the "bleeding edge"....but, for us, it is a simple fix for the aware: use the 6GB SATA ports, and forget the 3GB SATA ports, done...we are usually not disk-bound, anyway. Cache/memory bus, yes, or CPU speed, yes, but not disk...

lavalamp 2011-02-01 19:18

[QUOTE=Christenson;250737]we are usually not disk-bound, anyway. Cache/memory bus, yes, or CPU speed, yes, but not disk...[/QUOTE]Usually, but just recently I ran out of onboard SATA ports (there were 10). After a re-arrange and the purchase of a RAID card, I'm now using 12 SATA ports out of 20 total.

Flatlander, on some boards there are sometimes additional SATA ports put there by the manufacturer which use a separate controller hooked up to a PCIe lane or two. On my board for example, there are 6 ports run from the ICH10R in the chipset, and then 4 ports run from two extra controllers.

joblack 2011-02-11 19:15

You should only use the two SATA6 ports (the others have the Intel Sandy bridge bug).

Christenson 2011-02-12 03:47

Back in the thread wondering which CPU was best, a Sandy Bridge machine was considered. Intel is clearly in full court fix mode, but suppose I wanted to duplicate my 6-core AMD machine...are there cheap, unfixed sandy bridge Mobos out there?

joblack 2011-02-12 15:32

[QUOTE=Christenson;252223]Back in the thread wondering which CPU was best, a Sandy Bridge machine was considered. Intel is clearly in full court fix mode, but suppose I wanted to duplicate my 6-core AMD machine...are there cheap, unfixed sandy bridge Mobos out there?[/QUOTE]

No, working mainboards are to be expected in March. The unfixed ones obviously didn't get cheaper.

The 6core AMD is a nice piece of work (and for the price a lot of faster in several circumstances). The advantage of e.g. the 2500K is the wide overclocking ablilty (but only with P boards (without included graphic card)). AMD boards are known to be more priceworthy than the Intel ones.

I suggest if you want to buy one now you might check out one of the AMDs cpus.

nucleon 2011-02-13 00:09

I have 2600k, gigabyte ud7 motherboard, corsair h70 cooler.

I can get to 4.8GHz but no higher. I've tried heaps of voltage changes - but no luck.

4.8GHz is only about 30mins prime stable :( Temp reaches 83degC.

Currently trying 4.5GHz, temperature maxes at 66degC. So far 15mins and going....

-- Craig

nucleon 2011-02-13 04:56

[QUOTE=nucleon;252302]I have 2600k, gigabyte ud7 motherboard, corsair h70 cooler.

I can get to 4.8GHz but no higher. I've tried heaps of voltage changes - but no luck.

4.8GHz is only about 30mins prime stable :( Temp reaches 83degC.

Currently trying 4.5GHz, temperature maxes at 66degC. So far 15mins and going....

[/QUOTE]

@4.8GHz and 4.5GHz prime95 25.11 dies at 768k torture test consistently (about 45-50mins in), but only when run from the start with default settings. It ends in blue screen. If I run the 768k test straight off - no problems. Bizare.

@4.5GHz prime95 26.5.2 was stable for 2.5hrs then I ended the test. Temps max at 68degC.

Big difference in temps there. Going to keep it at 4.5GHz for a while. I might leave it go for 24hrs+

-- Craig

Flatlander 2011-02-13 18:07

I've got 4.4GHz stable, Prime95, 8 threads, 1.325 volts in BIOS.
Max. temps are 64-68C with Noctua cooler depending on ambient.
4.5GHz is reachable with more heat/noise.
I haven't tried raising BCLK yet.

(i7-2600k on Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD3. RAM @ 1600MHz.)


All times are UTC. The time now is 20:20.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.