People that 'preach' tolerance, tend to be intolerant of people that are intolerant.


BTW, just because one does not like something and advocates against it, does not mean that they wish to harm, kill, etc. those that like, do, or advocate for something. To call them intolerant or phobic is not always stating the truth. If something is not philic, that does not de facto make it phobic.

[quote]People that 'preach' tolerance, tend to be intolerant of people that are intolerant.


BTW, just because one does not like something and advocates against it, does not mean that they wish to harm, kill, etc. those that like, do, or advocate for something. To call them intolerant or phobic is not always stating the truth. If something is not philic, that does not de facto make it phobic.[/quote]Is what you're saying the equivalent of denying the truth of the
aphorism "if you're not for me you're against me"?

No.

[quote=Uncwilly;242505]No.[/quote]

Good one-word answer.

[QUOTE=davar55;242521]Good one-word answer.[/QUOTE]
Thanks.

[URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpO6aYn1fUI"]exacerbate[/URL] bad

( an example )

Rather than discuss it in this thread, I suggest
starting a thread on Religious Intolerance
in the SoapBox.

I think that may be a topic whose time has come.

(There are other kinds of intolerance.)

[QUOTE=davar55;242618]Rather than discuss it in this thread, I suggest
starting a thread on Religious Intolerance
in the SoapBox.

I think that may be a topic whose time has come.

(There are other kinds of intolerance.)[/QUOTE]Seconded.

You start the thread and, if necessary, I'll move any appropriate posts over there.

[QUOTE=xilman;242625]Seconded.

You start the thread and, if necessary, I'll move any appropriate posts over there.[/QUOTE]Done.

[QUOTE=xilman;242625]Seconded.

You start the thread and, if necessary, I'll move any appropriate posts over there.[/QUOTE]My comments where made in response to a prior post. They are now taken out of context. Please restore them to that thread or delete them altogether.

I suggest that your comment, now the OP of this thread, is perfectly
valid and could remain here, although the motivation for this thread
is now in the other thread.