mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   Aliquot Sequences (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=90)
-   -   Archived reservation posts (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=14330)

science_man_88 2012-01-27 17:55

I'm going to see how high I can take this for now currently working on i948 sz. 130 = 2*3*C129 right now.

c10ck3r 2012-01-29 00:50

Releasing 20208. i1551 C126, 2^3, 3^4,5...C113 cofactor. Added 26 iterations.
Taking 207714, i2943 C118, 2^2.7.11...C111

science_man_88 2012-02-03 15:13

[QUOTE=science_man_88;287439]I'm going to see how high I can take this for now currently working on i948 sz. 130 = 2*3*C129 right now.[/QUOTE]

just as an update I'm now working on line 985 about 160 lines from when I started it, now size 131 with a C120 cofactor. it's been driver 2*3 almost the whole time I believe

firejuggler 2012-02-03 16:28

releasing 266136 , taking 765380

RobertS 2012-02-03 17:37

[QUOTE=firejuggler;288195] taking 765380[/QUOTE]
from[B]Sequence terminations (and merges)[/B]
765380 unconnected 22 Mar 2011 102 1713 Prime

It seems to be wrong in the DB

And releasing 901752

firejuggler 2012-02-03 17:52

ah shoot... well I checked but i'm pretty sure that 985596 is free, right? nevermind,985596(i1462) merge with 944474 (i0)

RobertS 2012-02-03 17:57

[QUOTE=firejuggler;288201]ah shoot... well I checked but i'm pretty sure that 985596 is free, right?[/QUOTE]
It is now at < 60 digits in size in the DB and all seqs were up to > 110 digits. So there is definitely something wrong with the DB.?

bchaffin 2012-02-03 18:08

[QUOTE=RobertS;288202]It is now at < 60 digits in size in the DB and all seqs were up to > 110 digits. So there is definitely something wrong with the DB.?[/QUOTE]

Does anyone have any evidence that 985596 was ever at 110 digits (or terminated/merged)?

It doesn't show up in a search of the forum, so it was never included in any 100-digit or 110-digit subproject. And it's not the the list of open sequences that my workers have been tracking for the last year.

So either it was terminated/merged more than a year ago and is now missing from the DB, or it somehow got overlooked all this time. I'm not sure which is more unlikely.

RobertS 2012-02-03 18:14

[QUOTE=bchaffin;288207]Does anyone have any evidence that 985596 was ever at 110 digits (or terminated/merged)?.[/QUOTE]

It merges with 944474 i1462, max size <50 digits

fivemack 2012-02-03 18:19

There is definitely something wrong with the db.

My script happily runs 985596 from iteration 1 to iteration 1491, at which it stops, in about a minute on one 2GHz Athlon64.

Comparing the output with the db:

(db)

Checked 731 21 (show) 745712356057859328544<21> = 2^5 · 7^2 · 490889183 · 968817151
Checked 732 21 (show) 962102102235363155150<21> = 2 · 5^2 · 7 · 420047 · 1804937 · 3625711
Checked 733 22 (show) 1083058646835105174322<22> = 2 · 11 · 23857 · 323797 · 6372951919<10>

(me)
[code]
731 745712356057859328544=2^5*7^2*490889183*968817151
732 962102107477168600544=2^5*7*37*3769*5483*25633*219143
[/code]

so sigma(N) has been mis-computed at line 731; pari-gp agrees with me.

The mis-computation is exactly what you would produce if you believed 475581859730777633 (= 490889183*968817151) to be prime.

I've told syd.

firejuggler 2012-02-03 18:36

was about to report the same, thanks.


All times are UTC. The time now is 23:01.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.