[QUOTE=10metreh;244230]All sequences below 100000 should already be at 110 digits (Subprojects #4 and #6, along with Clifford Stern's ongoing work). If they are below 110 digits in the DB, then check Clifford's [URL="http://www.lafn.org/~ax810/five.txt"]five.txt[/URL] file - those sequences below 110 digits are probably a result of Clifford not having put them in the DB yet.[/QUOTE]

No, a week ago there were 6 sequences <100K that were at < 110 digits.

We waited how long for others who had reserved 250K-500K to get them all in the DB to 100 digits? Something like over a year? Finally some people here stepped in and worked them themselves because they were tired of waiting and subsequently termined several sequences. That's what I'm doing here. We are now searching all n=100K-150K to 110 digits so it seems appropriate that n<100K be at 110 digits also.

In the mean time, I'm releasing the first batch of 3: 49692, 56196, and 60452, because I have completed them to >= 110 digits:

49692; i=1401; sz 110; C102; 2*3
56196; i=1249; sz 113; C111; 2^3*3^2
60452; i=766; sz 110; C101; 2*3

I started 56196 from a size of just 102 digits. All have had a full set of ECM curves run on them.

Reserving 712956.

Reserving 233502 for Clifford.

PS. I'll try and post an update on statuses later this week.....

If nobody is working on 620328 I'll reserve it.

Reserving 7221764.

[QUOTE=schickel;244453]Reserving 7221764.[/QUOTE]

Is this a typo? I don't see why you would want to reserve a sequence above 1000000 with 92 digits that has the 2^2 * 7 driver.

Releasing 76014 and 97164. They are now at >= 110 digits. Status:

76014; i=1092; sz 117; C99; 2^6*3
97164; i=2037; sz 110; C109; 2^2*7

I'm still working on 99312. To the best of my knowledge, it is the only remaining sequence <120K that is at < 110 digits.

[QUOTE=10metreh;244465]Is this a typo? I don't see why you would want to reserve a sequence above 1000000 with 92 digits that has the 2^2 * 7 driver.[/QUOTE]:censored: Yes, it's supposed to be 721764....sorry! (Fat fingers on the keyboard.....)

[QUOTE=schickel;244525]:censored: Yes, it's supposed to be 721764....sorry! (Fat fingers on the keyboard.....)[/QUOTE]

That is reserved by rodac who hasn't been on the forum since February... I think that one's probably fine. :smile:

[QUOTE=10metreh;244531]That is reserved by rodac who hasn't been on the forum since February... I think that one's probably fine. :smile:[/QUOTE]That's wierd...I searched and didn't see it in the top post.....well, since it's got the downdriver, I'll run it and see what happens, but I hate to step on someone's toes. :unsure:

[QUOTE=schickel;244532]That's wierd...I searched and didn't see it in the top post.....well, since it's got the downdriver, I'll run it and see what happens, but I hate to step on someone's toes. :unsure:[/QUOTE]:doh!: I thought I looked all the way to the bottom of the search results...it's at the bottom.

I wonder what happened....there were only ~20 lines added from where he apparently left off. And reviewing his posts shows he posted exclusively in the Aliquot forum.....very strange.