![]() |
1854-1856 complete, no primes.
|
How deeply sieved and choice of exponents
I noticed instead of a large range of k values, the list I am crunching right now has a few small ks and a wide range of even exponents.
I am wondering how deeply this file was sieved, and what program can generate multiple exponents? I have only seen a fixed-exp-multiple-k prime siever. Thanks in advance. |
All exponents are not even, there are both even and odd ones. Please check again the results you already enclosed.
The sieving depth of test files is given in the first post: 70P = 7E16. Regarding sieving software, almost all of them can generate multiple exponents: NewPGen (fixed k), srsieve, psieve. However, fixed-exp sieving is faster. |
[QUOTE=Kosmaj;266644]All exponents are not even, there are both even and odd ones.[/QUOTE]
Sorry, didn't mean to imply they were all even, just a "wide range of them" were. I've only sieved on odd powers with fixed exponents, so I was not used to seeing them. [QUOTE=Kosmaj;266644]The sieving depth of test files is given in the first post: 70P = 7E16.[/QUOTE] Wow! 70,000,000,000,000,000? Isn't that 70 Quadrillion? What does the P stand for? [QUOTE=Kosmaj;266644] Regarding sieving software, almost all of them can generate multiple exponents: NewPGen (fixed k), srsieve, psieve. However, fixed-exp sieving is faster.[/QUOTE] I didn't know that about NewPGen, thanks. I'll check it out. |
[QUOTE=LiquidNitrogen;266676]Wow! 70,000,000,000,000,000? Isn't that 70 Quadrillion? What does the P stand for?[/QUOTE]
It stands for Peta which is the SI unit for 1e15. So 1 Petabyte = 1000 Terabytes. |
[QUOTE=amphoria;266681]It stands for Peta which is the SI unit for 1e15. So 1 Petabyte = 1000 Terabytes.[/QUOTE]
Ahh, I see, thanks. |
taking 1896 to 1898
|
1866-1876 complete, no primes.
taking 1876-1886 |
1 Attachment(s)
1830-1832 complete. no primes.
|
Added more test files past 1900k.
TO NEW MEMBERS: Please kindly observe the following rule: Make your reservations starting with the first available file at the top of the list in the first post of the thread. Thanks! |
[QUOTE=Syd;266788]taking 1896 to 1898[/QUOTE]
done, no primes |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 21:22. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.