It's not fixed on the unproven conjectures page. I hit refresh to make sure. Maybe it'll fix itself with the next hourly update at :30 after the hour.

[QUOTE=gd_barnes;308661]It's not fixed on the unproven conjectures page. I hit refresh to make sure. Maybe it'll fix itself with the next hourly update at :30 after the hour.[/QUOTE]

It could be bad data in the temp files. You should delete those files before the next run so that it can recompute the numbers.

[QUOTE=rogue;308662]It could be bad data in the temp files. You should delete those files before the next run so that it can recompute the numbers.[/QUOTE]
Which files should I delete? I don't see any temp files present:
[code]
max@jeepford:/home/nplb/html/crus/vstats_new$ ls
11_proc_reserv_pages.txt all_ck_riesel.txt
12_proc_conjecture_pages.txt all_ck_sierpinski.txt
21_build_stats_tables.txt crus-proven.htm
22_build_top20_tables.txt crus-stats.htm
23_build_unproven_list.txt crus-top20.htm
24_build_proven_list.txt crus-unproven.htm
31_stats2html.txt riesel_difficulty.txt
32_stats2html.txt riesel_weights.txt
33_stats2html.txt sierpinski_difficulty.txt
41_build_stats_html.txt sierpinski_weights.txt
42_build_top20_html.txt srsieve
43_build_unproven_html.txt stats_script.bat
44_build_proven_html.txt stats_script.sh
[/code]

These files:

riesel_difficulty.txt
riesel_weights.txt
sierpinski_difficulty.txt
sierpinski_weights.txt

These are "temp" in the sense that the scripts will re-create if necessary. Rows in these files are updated when the corresponding conjecture has an update.

Wow. I had forgotten about those also. Great pages Mark.:tu:

[QUOTE=MyDogBuster;308683]Wow. I had forgotten about those also. Great pages Mark.:tu:[/QUOTE]

Thanks! Hopefully the problem with negative values will be fixed soon.

Now everyone get out there and prove some conjectures. :smile:

Okay, I deleted the temp files and re-ran the script...but I needed to kill it manually when I realized it was going to take a lot longer than I'd thought to regenerate the weights, so it wouldn't run into the impending hourly run in a few minutes. So the pages may be a bit scrambled at the moment...they should be correct after the next hourly run (3:30 CDT/server time) completes.

That is probably due to R63.

Everything looks good with one teensy weensy exception:

On the unproven page, for some reason Riesel base 63 has a zero difficulty even though it should be huge. Perhaps because the difficulty would be so high, it can't handle it. lol

Nice work Mark and Max! :smile:

The list of proven 1K/2K/3K conjectures
 

Gary,

The end of the following table contains the same info we are manually maintaining in the title thread.

[URL]http://www.noprimeleftbehind.net/crus/tab/CRUS_tab.htm[/URL]

Can we stop maintaining that thread. One of the two is wrong and I'm voting on our manual table as the culprit. :surprised

[QUOTE=MyDogBuster;308745]Gary,

The end of the following table contains the same info we are manually maintaining in the title thread.

[URL]http://www.noprimeleftbehind.net/crus/tab/CRUS_tab.htm[/URL]

Can we stop maintaining that thread. One of the two is wrong and I'm voting on our manual table as the culprit. :surprised[/QUOTE]

I knew it was a duplication for a long time but enjoyed keeping it updated. I also checked the totals with Karsten's pages on many different occassions and they were correct. Have you added the powers-of-2 plus regular conjectures together from Karsten's page to see if it totals to ours on both sides?

Regardless, I'll be glad to keep the manual one updated in the future.