M268435456=F28-2

[QUOTE=Dubslow;312535]That is a monster B-S find... wow. I'm pretty sure you [URL="http://www.mersenne.ca/brent-suyama.php?s=b2m&o=d"]smashed the record[/URL].

Could you submit the result [URL="http://www.mersenne.ca/index.php?submitresults=1"]here[/URL] so that it appears on that list?[/QUOTE]

Just to let you know, it seems that [URL="http://www.mersenne.ca/brent-suyama.php"]statistics[/URL] are not updated.

[QUOTE=Jatheski;314860]Just to let you know, it seems that [URL="http://www.mersenne.ca/brent-suyama.php"]statistics[/URL] are not updated.[/QUOTE]Thanks (and thanks to Dubslow for pointing me to this thread).

I have found (and fixed) the problem whereby new P-1 factors weren't updating the table as required. I have also gone back and fixed the 4570 affected exponents that weren't correctly registered. And I have also rebuilt the Brent-Suyama table so that the missing exponents are now listed.

Now that I've fixed the problem it should continue to operate correctly, but please let me know (PM or email) if it's misbehaving in some way.

edit: I just added the date field to the display, [strike]it should automatically populate with date-discovered during its automated overnight update[/strike] and rebuilt the database again so the dates show up now.

[QUOTE=James Heinrich;314920]Thanks (and thanks to Dubslow for pointing me to this thread).

I have found (and fixed) the problem whereby new P-1 factors weren't updating the table as required. I have also gone back and fixed the 4570 affected exponents that weren't correctly registered. And I have also rebuilt the Brent-Suyama table so that the missing exponents are now listed.

Now that I've fixed the problem it should continue to operate correctly, but please let me know (PM or email) if it's misbehaving in some way.

edit: I just added the date field to the display, it should automatically populate with date-discovered during its automated overnight update.[/QUOTE]
:tu: :smile:

Teh interwebz are an awesome place. :grin:

[QUOTE=James Heinrich;314920]I have found (and fixed) the problem whereby new P-1 factors weren't updating the table as required...[/QUOTE]
Thanks!

[QUOTE=James Heinrich;314920]I have found (and fixed) the problem whereby new P-1 factors weren't updating the table as required.[/QUOTE]

Thanks !

[QUOTE=Dubslow;312535]That is a monster B-S find... wow. I'm pretty sure you [URL="http://www.mersenne.ca/brent-suyama.php?s=b2m&o=d"]smashed the record[/URL].
[/QUOTE]

Yes I did !!
:toot::fusion:

P-1 found a factor in stage #1, B1=535000.
UID: Jwb52z/Clay, M58348951 has a factor: 179068177582890463986842786311

97.176 bits.

P-1 found a factor in stage #2, B1=535000, B2=9897500.
UID: Jwb52z/Clay, M58376471 has a factor: 430369798332186021062236207481

98.442 bits.

My first prime k
 

M[URL="http://www.mersenne.ca/exponent.php?exponentdetails=122881769"]122881769[/URL] has a factor: 43419285610788256439 (65.235 bits)
k=176670982051 (prime)

This is my first factor with k being a prime!

[QUOTE=firejuggler;250103]thanks to mfackt....

[code]
M80622803 has a factor 156127704855377865257
M80547619 has a factor 164225854090231111921
M80623813 has a factor 74358285257003853433
M80465149 has a factor 205346902306982285351
M80645441 has a factor 74037992691676741151
M80429911 has a factor 33776959888323700737
M80625551 has a factor 110687074647006079529
M80589031 has a factor 46693727088018753713
M79154843 has a factor 68788380075731936863
M80701741 has a factor 57218973166606961263
M80309303 has a factor 118578090508483702721
M80696089 has a factor 66027939754284563593
M80699447 has a factor 47032613446676890273
M80630159 has a factor 5856285027082755031
M80700929 has a factor 44381842139698978511
M80701553 has a factor 45527575148762247041
M80624041 has a factor 37515177594283365607
M80581283 has a factor 70717839619935960241
M80701561 has a factor 55672736219070980281
M80650799 has a factor 51454583621456883601
M77224867 has a factor 39977700267067630681
[/code]

in the last few days, all by TF[/QUOTE]

I'm doing some double checking of older posts here. 2 of these factors are composite with very small factors and hence are incorrect:

33776959888323700737 = 3 * 13 * 419^2 * 4933190711903
[The factor should be 133776959888323700737.]

5856285027082755031 = 13 * 227 * 691 * 77893 * 36870287
[The factor should be 95856285027082755031.]

I'm just curious. Is it considered redundant to enter the factors reported in this thread into the factor database at factordb.com ? I see many of them not in there.