I updated the [url=https://www.mersenne.ca/json2bbcode.php]BBcode results encoder[/url] to also handle non-JSON results for your convenience:[QUOTE=storm5510;554600][M]M7765781[/M] has a 96.826-bit (30-digit) factor: [url=https://www.mersenne.ca/M7765781]140468706376328182650630225863[/url] (P-1,B1=370000,B2=8140000)
[M]M7743221[/M] has a 100.621-bit (31-digit) factor: [url=https://www.mersenne.ca/M7743221]1949670033377397597594276583567[/url] (P-1,B1=370000,B2=8140000,E=6)
[M]M7766881[/M] has a 103.544-bit (32-digit) factor: [url=https://www.mersenne.ca/M7766881]14786058658810602089190892018393[/url] (P-1,B1=370000,B2=8140000)[/quote]

[QUOTE=James Heinrich;554606]I updated the [URL="https://www.mersenne.ca/json2bbcode.php"]BBcode results encoder[/URL] to also handle non-JSON results for your convenience:[/QUOTE]

That's right. You did and I had forgotten. Shame on me. :blush:

I keep all my results. I wrote a quick-and-dirty little program which will read through a results file and pick out lines with factor information and write them to another text file. It is a work-in-progress, but good enough that I may have missed the three above without it.

:smile:

From July:

[QUOTE]UID: storm5510/7700_Kaby_Lake, M7743221 has a factor: 1949670033377397597594276583567 (P-1, B1=370000, B2=8140000, E=6), AID: 0C70DF7EE62E9F9A34F8DE8387A2F292

31 digits.
100.621 bits.[/QUOTE][B]James Heinrich[/B]: This is a [I]Prime95 result[/I]. Your BBCode convertor did not want to work with it.

[M]M100091029[/M] has a 101.349-bit (31-digit) factor: [URL="https://www.mersenne.ca/M100091029"]3228091182977790599237506837961[/URL] (P-1,B1=650000,B2=22000000)

[B][U]A correction to post #1598 :[/U][/B]

v30 of [I]Prime95[/I] creates dual results entries in two different files. I made a false assumption that JSON only happened with PRP work. :blush:

[QUOTE=storm5510;554714][B]James Heinrich[/B]: This is a [I]Prime95 result[/I]. Your [url=https://www.mersenne.ca/json2bbcode.php]BBCode convertor[/url] did not want to work with it.[/QUOTE]It accepts it now.

[QUOTE=storm5510;554726]v30 of [I]Prime95[/I] creates dual results entries in two different files.[/QUOTE]That's not new to v30:[code]New features in Version 29.8 of prime95.exe
6) JSON results are now available for all work performed. JSON results are
written to results.json.txt.[/code]

[QUOTE=James Heinrich;554758]It accepts it now.

That's not new to v30:[code]New features in Version 29.8 of prime95.exe
6) JSON results are now available for all work performed. JSON results are
written to results.json.txt.[/code][/QUOTE]

I remember seeing [I]results.json.txt[/I] files prior to v30, now that you mention it. Looking at them, word-wrapped in Notepad, they did not seem to make a lot of sense. Turning off word-wrap, they appeared as very long lines of text. Perhaps in the future, the old forms will cease, at least in [I]Prime95[/I]. Other programs, like [I]mfakt(x)[/I] will need some revision to comply. [U]I appreciate your efforts[/U].

:davar55: Me and my precious 122 bit factor even won't appear in that Top-200.

James, you [B][U]must[/U][/B] extend that top to 300 or 500 :rant:

[QUOTE=LaurV;554794]:davar55: Me and my precious 122 bit factor even won't appear in that Top-200.
James, you [B][U]must[/U][/B] extend that top to 300 or 500 :rant:[/QUOTE]Your "precious" would be #256 on the [URL="https://www.mersenne.ca/pm1user/1"]list[/URL] if I would extend it that far.

[QUOTE=James Heinrich;554804]Your "precious" would be #256 on the [URL="https://www.mersenne.ca/pm1user/1"]list[/URL] if I would extend it that far.[/QUOTE]
Yay! Power of two! I knew it that's something important with it! :razz:
Thanks!

BTW just today I just found a 116 bits factor, so now you have to extend it further. Haha, just kidding man. But I [U]did[/U] just found a [URL="https://www.mersenne.ca/exponent/105890809"]116 bits factor[/URL], and anyhow, it is funny to see how you take it so serious every time. Kudos and kutgw! :bow:


(P.S.: the best part of it is that now I can click on my name and see my factors! Before, as I was not in the table, and could never remember my "jail number", it was more complicate - bookmarks, search, saved link, etc, hihi)

[QUOTE=LaurV;554794]...Me and my precious 122 bit factor even won't appear in that Top-200. ..[/QUOTE]

35-digits. That is really good. I have a 39-digit but it would not appear on this list. It is ECM. I do not know if anyone in this group has noticed, ECM assignments are now 7 curves. I run a few on my antique machine on occasion. Anyway, I have always believed larger factors are more commonly found with P-1.