![]() |
[QUOTE=NBtarheel_33;309503]August 27, 2012. All exponents below [B]25[/B] million have been double-checked.[/QUOTE]
Bugger. I was looking forward to doing one of them. |
There are now no exponents between 42643801 and 43112609 that have not been tested once.
|
[QUOTE=Uncwilly;309846]There are now no exponents between 42643801 and 43112609 that have not been tested once.[/QUOTE]
HIP HIP Hooray. Thank God for Chalsall. The man's 'king genius. :davieddy: |
The "Signals" have been really flashing, haven't they? LOL
|
[QUOTE=Uncwilly;309846]There are now no exponents between 42643801 and 43112609 that have not been tested once.[/QUOTE]
I've got a related question. The milestone page shows: [LIST][*][SIZE=2]Countdown to testing all exponents below M(42643801) once: 2[/SIZE][/LIST]But the PrimeNet Summary shows only 1 NO-LL below [SIZE=2]M(42643801). How do I reconcile the apparent disagreement? [/SIZE] |
[QUOTE=sichase;310306]How do I reconcile the apparent disagreement?[/QUOTE]
There appears to be a bug with the summary page. Both 41959639 and 42054407 have not yet had a LL completed. |
The summary page should be taken as orientative only. There [U]are[/U] bugs on that, even if you consider only how the active assignments are counted and how the suspect tests are dealing with. Long ago I was curious and started adding numbers horizontally and vertically and the totals did not match. I posted on the forum, and someone else replied the same thing I reply now.
|
September 5, 2012: All exponents below M(43112609) tested at least once.
September 5, 2012: All exponents below 43,000,000 tested at least once. September 5, 2012: All exponents below M(42643801) tested at least once. September 5, 2012: All exponents below 42,000,000 tested at least once. |
As a bonus, [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=42104681&exp_hi=10000&B1=Get+status"]M42104681[/URL] was double-checked really quick. :big grin:
|
[QUOTE=ckdo;310382]September 5, 2012: All exponents below M(43112609) tested at least once.
September 5, 2012: All exponents below 43,000,000 tested at least once. September 5, 2012: All exponents below M(42643801) tested at least once. September 5, 2012: All exponents below 42,000,000 tested at least once.[/QUOTE] Yup... Our "friend" Signals has been busy.... |
[QUOTE=ckdo;310382]September 5, 2012: All exponents below M(43112609) tested at least once.
September 5, 2012: All exponents below 43,000,000 tested at least once. September 5, 2012: All exponents below M(42643801) tested at least once. September 5, 2012: All exponents below 42,000,000 tested at least once.[/QUOTE] Are there any exponents below 43112609 that only have suspect LL result(s)? Do they count as "tested at least once"? |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 23:07. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.