It can also be seen here: [URL="http://hoegge.dk/mersenne/GIMPSstats.html"]GIMPSstats.html[/URL]

At the bottom of the LL-D column:
Last 365 days: 72112 ([B]198 per day[/B])
Last 30 days: 11168 ([B]372 per day[/B])
Last 7 days 4950 ([B]707 per day[/B])
Last 24 hours: [B]781[/B]

[QUOTE=ATH;554826]It can also be seen here: [URL="http://hoegge.dk/mersenne/GIMPSstats.html"]GIMPSstats.html[/URL]

At the bottom of the LL-D column:
Last 365 days: 72112 ([B]198 per day[/B])
Last 30 days: 11168 ([B]372 per day[/B])
Last 7 days 4950 ([B]707 per day[/B])
Last 24 hours: [B]781[/B][/QUOTE]
Based upon the July 10 capture of that page by archive.org (pre-cert impact)
Last 365 days: 64630 ([B]177 per day[/B])
Last 30 days: 5691 ([B]190 per day[/B])

Maybe also take in account the huge LL-D results of user "dmbeeson" to explain the recent growth of LL-D : [url]https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=25812[/url]

But those are all down in the 57,000,000 and 58,000,000 range.

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;554861]But those are all down in the 57,000,000 and 58,000,000 range.[/QUOTE]

I was referring to the stats of ATH where the impact of dmbeeson is actually present.
Your figures are indeed not linked to those LL-D's.

Starting sometime in the next 24 hours the main page should display CERTs as part of the Previous Day Stats Verified Prime Tests.

For 2020-08-25, the reported total of 217 should have been 767.

I was just looking at assignments below [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=91765997&exp_hi=93000000&execm=1&exdchk=1&exp1=1"]93,000,000[/URL]
Only 1 is a PRP. This may indicate that many of these people are running old hardware and/or old versions of Prime95. Also, there is one user that has a slug of TF's in what is the Cat 0 range. They were assigned in the Cat 1 range. Any exponent in the Cat 1 range (or if it falls into the Cat 1 range) should not be able to be assigned as TF, or if it was assigned TF and falls into Cat 1 the TF assignment should expire in say 10 days.

It might be wise to start only handing out LL's in the Cat 3 range and save all the Cat 0-2 range for v30. This is not forcing the machines to do DC's it is just moving the less upto date software/hardware combos up a bit.

[QUOTE=Prime95;554957]Starting sometime in the next 24 hours the main page should display CERTs as part of the Previous Day Stats Verified Prime Tests. [/QUOTE]

This is the first time I have noticed it with more Verified than First tests!!! Very cool!!!

[QUOTE=Runtime Error;555785]This is the first time I have noticed it with more Verified than First tests!!! Very cool!!![/QUOTE]
I hadn't noticed that ticker. I wonder if that includes PRP-CF certs.

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;555006]I was just looking at assignments below [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=91765997&exp_hi=93000000&execm=1&exdchk=1&exp1=1"]93,000,000[/URL]
Only 1 is a PRP. This may indicate that many of these people are running old hardware and/or old versions of Prime95. Also, there is one user that has a slug of TF's in what is the Cat 0 range. They were assigned in the Cat 1 range. Any exponent in the Cat 1 range (or if it falls into the Cat 1 range) should not be able to be assigned as TF, or if it was assigned TF and falls into Cat 1 the TF assignment should expire in say 10 days.

It might be wise to start only handing out LL's in the Cat 3 range and save all the Cat 0-2 range for v30. This is not forcing the machines to do DC's it is just moving the less upto date software/hardware combos up a bit.[/QUOTE]

The server generally hands out expired LL assignments only as new LL assignments. The rationale is that is the expired LL assignment does finally report a result we can have a double-check when the new LL assignment reports in.

I've been working on clearing out the 93M TF problem. I should have it all cleared by month's end.

[QUOTE=Prime95;555802]I've been working on clearing out the 93M TF problem. I should have it all cleared by month's end.[/QUOTE]

LOL... :tu: