next milestone
 

Just 1 exponent, 2 days estimated Feb 3 to 88M first test milestone.

[url]https://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=87777533&exp_hi=88000000&execm=1&exp1=1&extf=1&exdchk=1[/url]

Less than 200,000 unfactored below .....
 

10 Million.

Joins 50M to 90M inclusive

We passed 29,700,000 exponents with known factor(s) yesterday Feb 11th: [URL="http://hoegge.dk/mersenne/GIMPSstats.html"]GIMPSstats.html[/URL]
(of 50,847,534 total exponents below 1 B).

Estimated 800-900 days until we reach 30,000,000 exponents with known factor(s).

Just for those are watching the DC milestone count down. I sent Ryan a PM about the exponent that is not moving. I offered to take the exponent if needed.

DON'T POACH.

[EDIT]Ryan has that exponent fired up and another that got left behind elsewhere[/edit]

50M DC milestone in a day or less
 

rudimeier is bringing it home. [URL]https://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=49917871&exp_hi=50000000&execm=1&exp1=1&extf=1&exfirst=1[/URL]

[URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=79078529&full=1"]79078529[/URL] And I thought double-checks would be practically unnecessary at PRP!
How big is the error rate actually?

[QUOTE=moebius;537805]And I thought double-checks would be practically unnecessary at PRP!
How big is the error rate actually?[/QUOTE]I doesn't matter if the error rate is zero, there will always be a need for double checks because people are not always honest.

[QUOTE=moebius;537805][URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=79078529&full=1"]79078529[/URL] And I thought double-checks would be practically unnecessary at PRP!
How big is the error rate actually?[/QUOTE]

I am curious as to the client versions that did each of those tests.

[QUOTE=moebius;537805][URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=79078529&full=1"]79078529[/URL] And I thought double-checks would be practically unnecessary at PRP!
How big is the error rate actually?[/QUOTE]
We need a lot more PRP DC to assess that. The lower the error rate is, the more DC we need to gauge the error rate. In [url]https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=465431&postcount=88[/url] Gerbicz gave an error rate of <2/mp. I believe that rate excludes user forgeries, transcription errors in manual reporting, and some software bugs.

Rudimeier please check with your office
 

[QUOTE=kriesel;537704]rudimeier is bringing it home. [URL]https://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=49917871&exp_hi=50000000&execm=1&exp1=1&extf=1&exfirst=1[/URL][/QUOTE]Nope; both seem to be stalled.

I PM'ed some folks that are near to having exponents expire that are in the Cat 1 and Cat 0 area.