[QUOTE=petrw1;527491]As I read it 1st and 3rd are current. The middle one is 17 days late.[/QUOTE]Update dates are changing, yes. But % completed?

[QUOTE=kriesel;527503]Update dates are changing, yes. But % completed?[/QUOTE]

That's what i meant by stuck.


There are 3 assignments
[code]
85526383 LL LL, [COLOR="Blue"][B]10.80%[/B][/COLOR] 2 8 2019-07-12 2019-10-08 2019-10-09 2019-10-16 c0nd0r
85767821 LL LL,[COLOR="blue"][B] 93.30%[/B][/COLOR] 0 -17 2019-09-08 2019-09-20 2019-09-21 2019-09-21 OscarX
85925303 LL LL, [COLOR="blue"][B]63.70%[/B][/COLOR] 35 11 2019-08-14 2019-10-08 2019-10-09 2019-10-19 Michael Quevillon[/code]

[QUOTE=rudy235;527536]That's what i meant by stuck.


There are 3 assignments
[code]
85526383 LL LL, [COLOR=Blue][B]10.80%[/B][/COLOR] 2 8 2019-07-12 2019-10-08 2019-10-09 2019-10-16 c0nd0r
85767821 LL LL,[COLOR=blue][B] 93.30%[/B][/COLOR] 0 -17 2019-09-08 2019-09-20 2019-09-21 2019-09-21 OscarX
85925303 LL LL, [COLOR=blue][B]63.70%[/B][/COLOR] 35 11 2019-08-14 2019-10-08 2019-10-09 2019-10-19 Michael Quevillon[/code][/QUOTE]
One expired and Jon Pace is now on the case. Unfortunate that it was so close to done before stalling out. Maybe someday it will complete as a double check.
C0nd0r's expires in a day.
Quevillon's has quite a while to go yet, and will probably determine the milestone timing.

Anonymous results overtook CurtisC within the last 30 days for the #1 Lifetime Ghz-days all categories combined and "TheJudger" is "pretty close" behind CurtisC in 3rd place:
[url]https://www.mersenne.org/report_top_500_custom/?team_flag=0&type=0&rank_lo=1&rank_hi=500&start_date=2000-01-01&end_date=[/url]

CurtisC has 97.9% in LL first tests while TheJudger has 93.4% in TF :-) Anonymous divided between LL, LL-D and TF.

In Lifetime "LL first tests" CurtisC still reigns supreme with ~2.5 times as much as all the Anonymous results combined and over 10 times as much as #3:
[url]https://www.mersenne.org/report_top_500_custom/?team_flag=0&type=1003&rank_lo=1&rank_hi=500&start_date=2000-01-01&end_date=[/url]

1 to go to 86M first primality test milestone
 

Expected completion a week away, Oct 27
[URL]https://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=85526383&exp_hi=86000000&execm=1&exp1=1&extf=1&exdchk=1[/URL]

Current projection is 87M milestone in early December. That's without the possible delaying effect of expire/reassign/complete the overdue assignments.

[QUOTE=kriesel;528422]Expected completion a week away, Oct 27
[URL]https://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=85526383&exp_hi=86000000&execm=1&exp1=1&extf=1&exdchk=1[/URL]

Current projection is 87M milestone in early December. That's without the possible delaying effect of expire/reassign/complete the overdue assignments.[/QUOTE]

Looks like it's stuck at 58.50%. :sad:

[QUOTE=dcheuk;529473]Looks like it's stuck at 58.50%. :sad:[/QUOTE]

YEP...Very much so...and on the second verification to 49 Million, 4 of the 5 exponents are stuck. Only [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=48885173&full=1"][COLOR="RoyalBlue"]this one here[/COLOR][/URL] is advancing!

[QUOTE=rudy235;529475]YEP...Very much so...and on the second verification to 49 Million, 4 of the 5 exponents are stuck. Only [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=48885173&full=1"][COLOR=RoyalBlue]this one here[/COLOR][/URL] is advancing![/QUOTE]Four of the five are reporting in recently, with indicated ETAs of 2 days or less. The other expires within a week. At worst case, all expire within 30 days, so it's likely to complete in December.

One way exponents can get stalled is if the number of prime95 workers on a system gets reduced. Some exponents in progress will get queued behind others from that, and won't see any more compute cycles until the exponents in front of them in the prime95 worktodo queue per worker get cleared, or the user manually intervenes.

In the run to 87M first test milestone, [URL]https://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=85526383&exp_hi=87000000&execm=1&exp1=1&extf=1&exdchk=1[/URL] there are 134 left. An interesting one is [URL]https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=86954009&full=1[/URL] which is sitting at 100.0% complete PRP but not submitted by rx yet; 12 days overdue, 56 days to expiration, hasn't reported in since Oct 21. It's looking iffy for December completion of this milestone, with some projected to take to mid December to complete, and others overdue and not reporting in, and requiring 8 weeks or more to expire.

Progress!
 

A recent update shows the last exponent to 86M now at 61.9%
[URL]https://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=85526383&exp_hi=86000000&execm=1&exp1=1&extf=1&exdchk=1[/URL]
But it, and Yoon's other exponent on node tulip, are projected to expire before their ETAs.
[url]https://www.mersenne.org/M86838679[/url]

I notice the count for the OneLL range 40,250,000 - 50,000,000 on [url=https://www.mersenne.org/report_classic/]the classic report[/url] is off by one. It always shows one extra.

[QUOTE=retina;529619]I notice the count for the OneLL range 40,250,000 - 50,000,000 on [url=https://www.mersenne.org/report_classic/]the classic report[/url] is off by one. It always shows one extra.[/QUOTE]
[code]
[SIZE="1"]40,250,000 50,000,000 553,232 2 357,490 193,438 [COLOR="SeaGreen"]2,302 [/COLOR] 0 0.000 0 1.640 2560[/SIZE][/code]


[code]Countdown to verifying all tests below 50 million: [COLOR="SeaGreen"]2 301[/COLOR] (1 960 available)[/code]


True, but there is still a lot of time to get this fixed.