mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   Data (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=21)
-   -   Newer milestone thread (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=13871)

ET_ 2018-06-26 11:26

[QUOTE=rudy235;490512]I don't understand what you mean by that.[/QUOTE]

When I click on the link of the remaining exponents, only 1 instead of 21 are shown because the url is wrong

rudy235 2018-06-26 20:49

[QUOTE=ET_;490591]When I click on the link of the remaining exponents, only 1 instead of 21 are shown because the url is wrong[/QUOTE]

I see that now.
This is the correct link. [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=79087153&exp_hi=79300000&execm=1&exp1=1&extf=1&exdchk=1"]https://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=79087153&exp_hi=79300000&execm=1&exp1=1&extf=1&exdchk=1[/URL]
One of the Moderators should be able to fix that. Hint Hint!

GP2 2018-06-27 01:02

[QUOTE=rudy235;490455]This new limit has now been incorporated to the milestone page.[/QUOTE]

But the wording is wrong:

"Countdown to verifying all tests below the classic 79.3 million limit: 19"


It should be "first time checking all exponents"

Also the link at "19" has the wrong limit 79000000 instead of 79300000, as others have pointed out.

rudy235 2018-06-27 01:31

[QUOTE=GP2;490650]But the wording is wrong:

"Countdown to verifying all tests below the classic 79.3 million limit: 19"


It should be "first time checking all exponents"

Also the link at "19" has the wrong limit 79000000 instead of 79300000, as others have pointed out.[/QUOTE]

Yes, the wording is wrong (but forgivable) . But the link is "quite" wrong. LOL

rudy235 2018-06-28 18:45

NOW its been corrected BUT while the link in Milestones says 14 to go...
[code]There are [COLOR="Red"][B]14[/B][/COLOR] assignments

79087153 LL PRP, 37.90% 28 2 2018-06-26 2018-06-28 2018-06-29 2018-06-30 ATH
79110139 LL LL, 88.00% 0 12 2018-03-30 2018-06-26 2018-06-27 2018-07-10 Ansh Mehta
79145629 LL LL, 69.50% 5 13 2018-04-04 2018-06-28 2018-06-29 2018-07-11 TeamCritter
79173343 LL LL, 24.80% 7 9 2018-04-06 2018-06-17 2018-06-18 2018-07-07 Jon Russell
79176271 LL LL, 23.40% 8 9 2018-04-07 2018-06-17 2018-06-18 2018-07-07 Jon Russell
79188049 LL LL, 75.80% 25 1 2018-06-23 2018-06-28 2018-06-29 2018-06-29 Jon Pace
79212169 LL LL, 24.10% 12 30 2018-04-11 2018-06-28 2018-06-29 2018-07-28 arnaud
79212557 PRP PRP, 20.90% 10 2018-04-11 2018-06-28 2018-06-29 2018-07-08 ANONYMOUS
79260299 LL LL, 73.10% 27 -6 2018-04-26 2018-06-14 2018-06-15 2018-06-22 mestigoit
79277617 LL LL, 33.90% 15 6 2018-06-13 2018-06-28 2018-06-28 2018-07-04 riccardo uberti
79281949 LL LL, 85.10% 20 6 2018-04-19 2018-06-28 2018-06-29 2018-07-04 -Anonymous-
79289767 LL LL, 78.00% 15 2 2018-06-13 2018-06-28 2018-06-28 2018-06-30 riccardo uberti
79293779 LL LL, 0.30% 15 8 2018-06-13 2018-06-28 2018-06-28 2018-07-06 riccardo uberti
79293901 LL 5 5 2018-06-26 2018-06-27 2018-06-28 2018-07-03 ATH
[/code]

The link to the Classic [url]https://www.mersenne.org/report_classic/[/url] says differently: 13 to go!

[code]


Low High Numbers Primes Factored TwoLL OneLL

[SIZE="1"]69,100,000 79,300,000 562,700 2 365,079 7,495 190,111 [SIZE="3"][COLOR="red"][B]13[/B][/COLOR][/SIZE] 0.007 470 2.604 4096
Total 4,630,913 50 3,018,412 1,008,286 604,152 [SIZE="3"] [COLOR="Red"][B]13[/B][/COLOR][/SIZE] 0.025 470
[/SIZE][/code]

rudy235 2018-07-20 22:48

this was 2 weeks ago:
[QUOTE=rudy235;490802]
[code]


79212169 LL LL, 24.10% 12 30 2018-04-11 2018-06-28 2018-06-29 2018-07-28 arnaud

79260299 LL LL, 73.10% 27 -6 2018-04-26 2018-06-14 2018-06-15 2018-06-22 mestigoit
[/code]


Now the advance is even worse.
[code]
There are 2 assignments

they have changed people in charge of them but the are still nowhere near to closing!


There are 2 assignments
[code]
79212169 LL LL, 0.60% 20 4 2018-07-10 2018-07-13 2018-07-14 2018-07-24 Dax Mickelson
79260299 LL LL, 84.10% 5 -6 2018-04-26 2018-07-09 2018-07-10 2018-07-14 mestigoit[/code]

Uncwilly 2018-08-03 14:15

[QUOTE=rudy235;492213]this was 2 weeks ago:
There are 2 assignments

they have changed people in charge of them but the are still nowhere near to closing!


There are 2 assignments
[code]
79212169 LL LL, 0.60% 20 4 2018-07-10 2018-07-13 2018-07-14 2018-07-24 Dax Mickelson
79260299 LL LL, 84.10% 5 -6 2018-04-26 2018-07-09 2018-07-10 2018-07-14 mestigoit[/code][/QUOTE]
Hopefully Aaron has taken official notice of the first one and worked some db assignment magic on this. I noticed that someone threw a bunch of TF at it recently.

Maybe there could be a subset of the Mersenn-aires that TF and P-1 to the extreme stragglers of first time milestones. 'It ain't poaching if you are doing a different work type.'

I am throwing a bunch of P-1 at 79777211 (I went to mersenne.ca and asked for the worktodo entry with a 5.5% chance of finding a factor.)

rudy235 2018-08-14 20:40

2 Attachment(s)
[ATTACH]18959[/ATTACH] January 3rd 2018




[ATTACH]18960[/ATTACH] Today August 14[SUP]th[/SUP] 2018

Uncwilly 2018-08-14 22:32

[QUOTE=rudy235;493919][ATTACH]18960[/ATTACH] Today August 14[SUP]th[/SUP] 2018[/QUOTE]

:retina::chalsall::et_::george::anurag::curtisc::dubslow::skiing::cheesehead::pirate::grenade:

Madpoo 2018-08-15 02:57

I'm sure at the time, finishing the first time tests on exponents up to 79.3 million seemed as out of reach as getting to the moon. What version of Prime95 introduced that 4M FFT size, and what year was that anyway?

Umm... let me google that for myself: version 19.0, October 10th, 1999 - nearly 19 years ago ... same version that introduced P-1 factoring

In August 1999, we had just finished first time testing exponents up to 4 million, and in October 1999, exponents up to 2 million had been double-checked.

rudy235 2018-08-15 04:33

[QUOTE=Madpoo;493933]I'm sure at the time, finishing the first time tests on exponents up to 79.3 million seemed as out of reach as getting to the moon. What version of Prime95 introduced that 4M FFT size, and what year was that anyway?

Umm... let me google that for myself: version 19.0, October 10th, 1999 - nearly 19 years ago ... same version that introduced P-1 factoring

In August 1999, we had just finished first time testing exponents up to 4 million, and in October 1999, exponents up to 2 million had been double-checked.[/QUOTE]

Would you venture a guess as to when we could reach the limit of 79.3 million for double checked? 10 Years?


All times are UTC. The time now is 23:03.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.