[QUOTE=patrik;489548]What does it mean that one of the exponents is done to 100%, but is still listed as assigned?[/QUOTE]

Rounded to 100.00%? Maybe few more iterations to go?

It's must be stopped somewhere above 99.90% ? or maybe above 99.95%?

One week ago , this exponent was already displayed as 100.00 % done

[QUOTE=patrik;489548]What does it mean that one of the exponents is done to 100%, but is still listed as assigned?[/QUOTE]

I would guess > 99.995% registers as 100.00%

[QUOTE=ATH;489559]It's must be stopped somewhere above 99.90% ? or maybe above 99.95%?[/QUOTE]

Surely there is a C language printf statement somewhere internally that is displaying the figure, even if the actual language used by the server is PHP or similar.

So anything above 99.95% is rounded to 100.0%, in according with the usual rules for printf rounding to one decimal place.

In fact I verified this just now:

51637528 / [M]51663607[/M] = 99.94952% = displays as 99.9% after Manual Communication
51638156 / [M]51663607[/M] = 99.95074% = displays as 100.0% after Manual Communication

[QUOTE=De Wandelaar;489566]One week ago , this exponent was already displayed as 100.00 % done[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=rudy235;489567]I would guess > 99.995% registers as 100.00%[/QUOTE]

But the [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent"]Exponent Status[/URL] page only display progress to one decimal place. That is, either 99.9% or 100.0%

The threshold for displaying 100.0%, as I mentioned, is 99.95% iterations completed.

[QUOTE=GP2;489569]But the [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent"]Exponent Status[/URL] page only display progress to one decimal place. That is, either 99.9% or 100.0%

The threshold for displaying 100.0%, as I mentioned, is 99.95% iterations completed.[/QUOTE]

I believe we've beaten the subject to death!

[QUOTE=rudy235;489572]I believe we've beaten the subject to death![/QUOTE]

:deadhorse:

[QUOTE=rudy235;489572]I believe we've beaten the subject to death![/QUOTE]
Beating that horse more, if one lets the default numbers be, for the frequency of reports, or if he uses "reasonable" values (like every 1 million iterations, which is quite ok for a test of 80M+ even if it takes 40 days on a shitty computer, it still makes two reports per day), then every "step" of the report is about 100/80=1.25%. Therefore the number of exponents for which "shit happens" (i.e. last report falls in between 99.95% and 100%) is so small, and they are so rare, they can be counted on the fingers of one hand...

(Well, not exactly, but still, we don't see any problem here...)

Or, ya 'no, just fix it for real by turning off rounding. Or if that proves to be too difficult in C for some reason then just subtract 0.05 before printing the value.

Also, while you're at it, remove the trailing '0'. It is unneeded and gives a false impression about the precision being shown.

[QUOTE=axn;489558]Rounded to 100.00%? Maybe few more iterations to go?[/QUOTE]

It's weird... the 100% is reported by the client, and yeah, I think they do report in a rounded amount, but to report 100% it means the client would have to at least be 99.95% done since I think it reports as xx.x%