[QUOTE=ATH;486875]We just passed 1M double checks (for the entire 1B range) now at 10pm UTC (at 9pm it was at 999,993):
[/QUOTE]

In a few weeks we will also reach [B]0[/B] for the Status unknown in the "Classic Status"

Looking at the recent results: [url]https://www.mersenne.org/report_recent_results/[/url]

it looks like this was the 1,000,000th reported double checks:
[url]https://mersenne.org/M46888861[/url]

[QUOTE=ATH;486877]Looking at the recent results: [url]https://www.mersenne.org/report_recent_results/[/url]

it looks like this was the 1,000,000th reported double checks:
[url]https://mersenne.org/M46888861[/url][/QUOTE]

I wonder why the [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_classic/"]classic GIMPS status report[/URL] is running behind, then?

As of this writing, it's showing a total of 999,706 for the "TwoLL" column

[QUOTE=GP2;487160]I wonder why the [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_classic/"]classic GIMPS status report[/URL] is running behind, then?

As of this writing, it's showing a total of 999,706 for the "TwoLL" column[/QUOTE]It only shows results for exponents up to 79.3M, not the entire 1B range.

[QUOTE=GP2;487160]I wonder why the [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_classic/"]classic GIMPS status report[/URL] is running behind, then?

As of this writing, it's showing a total of 999,706 for the "TwoLL" column[/QUOTE]

There are around 46 million prime exponents between 79.3Million and 999,000,000

Of those, less than less than 960 have been double tested.

Correction: There are around 46 million prime exponents between 79.3Million and [STRIKE]999,000,000 [/STRIKE] 1,000,000.000

Of those, less than less than 960 have been double tested.

I just happened to catch this a few minutes ago: exactly 1,000,000 double-checked exponents in the classical 79.3M range.

Also, we are very close to dipping below 40,000 P90-years of work to go in completing a first run through the classical range.

Question: If M(exponent) is double-checked and subsequently factored, does that reduce the DC total while increasing the "Factored" total?

[QUOTE=NBtarheel_33;487325]Question: If M(exponent) is double-checked and subsequently factored, does that reduce the DC total while increasing the "Factored" total?[/QUOTE]Yes. The table reads left to right. The totals must sum to the total number of exponents. If it is Prime, that is the highest status, then those with a known factor, then those that have been DC'ed, then Single LL, then unknown. An exponent can only be in one of those categories (technically it can have a factor and been tested once or twice, but it gets moved into the factored category once a factor is found.)

If I recall correctly that have been periods in the past were the DC or LL have dropped because of factors being found.

The classic report says "Status Unknown" 1,112 below 79.3M ?

This report says only 387 left:
[url]https://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=78000000&exp_hi=79300000&execm=1&exdchk=1&exp1=1&extf=1[/url]

I have been saving hourly reports from [url]https://www.mersenne.org/primenet/[/url] and I had a manual script to sum all the columns to get the data like in post #2816: [url]http://mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=486875&postcount=2816[/url]

At the idea and request of rudy235 I made the script summing the columns run automatically and made it create this report, maybe people will find it useful:
[url]http://hoegge.dk/mersenne/GIMPSstats.html[/url]

The 332M cutoff is just below the 100M digit line, which seems like the most interesting spot above 100M exponents. There are more LL tests done above 332M than between 100M and 332M.