First milestone of 2017
 

All exponents below 39,000,000 double-checked.:max:

[QUOTE=proxy2222;454227]All exponents below 39,000,000 double-checked.:max:[/QUOTE]

Ah, I just checked. I figured it was happening this weekend but forgot to look yesterday.

Milestone page is now updated.

only one more to go for the 71 M milestone
 

[SIZE="3"]However that exponent [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=70723879&full=1"]70723879[/URL] as not been advancing a lot in its first week.

It might be between 16 and 17 days for it to finish. We'll have to wait and see if he picks up the pace.[/SIZE]

Yeah, I tried to grab that one when it expired a week ago, but I missed it and that guy got it. Otherwise it would have been done by now.

[QUOTE=rudy235;454934][SIZE=3]However that exponent [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=70723879&full=1"]70723879[/URL] as not been advancing a lot in its first week.

It might be between 16 and 17 days for it to finish. We'll have to wait and see if he picks up the pace.[/SIZE][/QUOTE]I am the one who has received that exponent, but I'm not quite sure why it happened. I must have received it as a category 0 exponent, but if I understand [URL]https://www.mersenne.org/thresholds/[/URL] correctly, I only ought to receive category 1 exponents (except for DC tasks). There shouldn't be anything in my previous results indicating that I would complete this exponent in 15 days.

[QUOTE=GAPa;454950]I am the one who has received that exponent, but I'm not quite sure why it happened. I must have received it as a category 0 exponent, but if I understand [URL]https://www.mersenne.org/thresholds/[/URL] correctly, I only ought to receive category 1 exponents (except for DC tasks). There shouldn't be anything in my previous results indicating that I would complete this exponent in 15 days.[/QUOTE]

You have 30 days for a category 0, so you have 23 days more, and since you did 30% in 7 days it should be fine:

[url]https://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=70723879&exp_hi=70723879[/url]

[url]https://www.mersenne.org/thresholds/[/url]



@Madpoo: Is the assignment page using the updates from default.mock.php now?

[url]https://www.mersenne.org/assignments/[/url]
[url]https://www.mersenne.org/assignments/default.mock.php[/url]

[QUOTE=ATH;454951]You have 30 days for a category 0, so you have 23 days more, and since you did 30% in 7 days it should be fine:

[URL]https://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=70723879&exp_hi=70723879[/URL]

[URL]https://www.mersenne.org/thresholds/[/URL][/QUOTE]Yes, I will be able to finish it before it expires, but I don't understand why I received it in the first place, since I don't think I fulfil the requirement 'Computer must have enough LL and DC GHz-days over the last 120 days to indicate the assignment will be completed in 15 days'.

[QUOTE=GAPa;454952]Yes, I will be able to finish it before it expires, but I don't understand why I received it in the first place, since I don't think I fulfil the requirement 'Computer must have enough LL and DC GHz-days over the last 120 days to indicate the assignment will be completed in 15 days'.[/QUOTE]

Maybe there's a bug in the Primenet code. This wouldn't be the first time.

Just finish the assignment as soon as you can. Meanwhile, the "back room guys" will try to figure out the mistake they made, and will hopefully learn from it.

Thankfully no lives were at risk in this case; some software has to be "Human Rated".

[QUOTE=GAPa;454952]Yes, I will be able to finish it before it expires, but I don't understand why I received it in the first place, since I don't think I fulfil the requirement 'Computer must have enough LL and DC GHz-days over the last 120 days to indicate the assignment will be completed in 15 days'.[/QUOTE]

The server thinks the computer has produced 24 LL results averaging 30 GHz-days/day over the last 120 days.

The only anomaly I see is that the server thinks there is only one worker window, but I'm seeing LL results reported about a day apart.

[QUOTE=Prime95;454957]The only anomaly I see is that the server thinks there is only one worker window, but I'm seeing LL results reported about a day apart.[/QUOTE]

And there is your bug. :smile:

[QUOTE=Prime95;454957]The only anomaly I see is that the server thinks there is only one worker window, but I'm seeing LL results reported about a day apart.[/QUOTE]Ah, I see. I have four workers, so that seems to explain it.