[QUOTE=Madpoo;431964]

Since it's in the 67M range where there are still lots of unassigned exponents, there's little danger of it being poached, but on the other hand it's #115 or so in the pecking order, so it should still qualify as cat 0.

I'm curious to see what kind of user/machine gets the assignment under the new rules, so it should be a good real world example..[/QUOTE]

You can monitor the 10 cat 0 assignments:


[CODE]
expo assigned date % complete GHz-days/day/worker
67086007 2016-04-19 13:43 0 13.5330595788194
67443881 2016-04-17 04:02 34.7 29.4085244821991
67386427 2016-04-16 18:21 30.5 22.4451511247799
67294391 2016-04-15 16:01 63.2 28.4298699832563
67261793 2016-04-15 03:00 78.9 21.1463127387037
67260283 2016-04-14 22:54 25.5 14.19514146147
67231781 2016-04-14 22:01 80.1 28.4298699832563
67150679 2016-04-14 19:44 73.4 19.9312860142
67122607 2016-04-14 12:02 62.9 26.7808856934549
67122481 2016-04-14 04:58 0.9 0.448497477546292
[/CODE]

25,000 contributors
 

If I am interpreting this report correctly we have now had over 25,000 different contributers to GIMPS

[url]http://www.mersenne.org/account/?details=1[/url]

Intersection of "Overall" and "of" from the Lifetime Stats report

[QUOTE=retina;431974]Would it/they have not checked-in said other assignment and that would show in the results/logs? :confused:[/QUOTE]

Well sure, if I had thought of that at the time. :smile:

The user checked in more progress, so now I have a delta to work from.

With only two check-ins this isn't perfect, but it's 1.9582% progress per day, so I estimate 48.8 days to completion (it's at 3.5% done now).

So... not as bad as it could have been.

[QUOTE=petrw1;432003]If I am interpreting this report correctly we have now had over 25,000 different contributers to GIMPS

[url]http://www.mersenne.org/account/?details=1[/url]

Intersection of "Overall" and "of" from the Lifetime Stats report[/QUOTE]

It's more than that... hmmm. I don't have the query in front of me that pulls that data, but it seems like it would be a subset... something to look at later on I suppose. Beyond 25K users though, the rankings and work put in are all pretty much the same, just a low white noise.

[QUOTE=Prime95;431990]
[CODE]
expo assigned date % complete GHz-days/day/worker
67150679 2016-04-14 19:44 73.4 19.9312860142
[/CODE][/QUOTE]

Turns out this was assigned to one of my dream machine Skylakes. Completed 6 days after assignment.

[QUOTE=ixfd64;431892]I think "Anonymous" would be more accurate. As for users without accounts, they should be marked as "Unregistered."[/QUOTE]
+1

Summy....
 

Seems to have picked up the pace...maybe he heard us talking about his rate of progress.

Still at the risk of expiring before completion but closing the gap.

[QUOTE=petrw1;432275]Seems to have picked up the pace...maybe he heard us talking about his rate of progress.

Still at the risk of expiring before completion but closing the gap.[/QUOTE]

How about that cat 1 with an ETA exceeding nine thousand days (almost a quarter century)?

[QUOTE=cuBerBruce;432281]How about that cat 1 with an ETA exceeding nine thousand days (almost a quarter century)?[/QUOTE]

Different guy/gal.

I was only referring to the 63M assignment at the tail end and at risk of expiring before completion.
Besides that other one will be expired LOOOOOOONG before 9,000 days

[QUOTE=cuBerBruce;432281]How about that cat 1 with an ETA exceeding nine thousand days (almost a quarter century)?[/QUOTE]How could [url=http://www.mersenne.org/M67542281]67542281[/url] be assigned to that computer ? It is a Category 1 assignment and the computer does not update and indeed the ETA is in 2041... Strange !

Jacob

[QUOTE=S485122;432310]How could [url=http://www.mersenne.org/M67542281]67542281[/url] be assigned to that computer ? It is a Category 1 assignment and the computer does not update and indeed the ETA is in 2041... Strange !

Jacob[/QUOTE]

See post #2415