[QUOTE=Madpoo;429101]EDIT: This seems like a good opportunity to roll out the new/improved exponent detail page:
[/QUOTE]
:tu: Very welcomed!

I would argue that the "% Done" column title should merely read "Progress".

The first 4 milestones that await achievement form a palindrome.

Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 64M: 3
Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 65M: 4
Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 66M: 5
Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 67M: 43

[SIZE="3"][B]3 [COLOR="Red"]4 [COLOR="Green"]5[/COLOR] 4[/COLOR]3[/B][/SIZE]

And done....
 

[QUOTE=Madpoo;428530]By the way petrw1, you have an exponent that is likely to expire probably mere hours before you finish:

EDIT #2: Oh, and also this: [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=35247787"]http://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=35247787[/URL] -- I'm showing you with a real ETA of 4.9 days and expires in 3 days.
[/QUOTE]

Thanks....CPU has been repurposed to non-Milestone blocking work.

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;429466]The first 4 milestones that await achievement form a palindrome.

Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 64M: 3
Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 65M: 4
Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 66M: 5
Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 67M: 43

[SIZE="3"][B]3 [COLOR="Red"]4 [COLOR="Green"]5[/COLOR] 4[/COLOR]3[/B][/SIZE][/QUOTE]

Also prime, fwiw.

Another Palindrome

All exponents below 35,190,131 have been tested and double-checked.
All exponents below 63,350,927 have been tested at least once.

Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 64M: 2 (Estimated completion : 2016-05-21)
Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 65M: 3 (Estimated completion : 2016-05-21)
Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 66M: 4 (Estimated completion : 2016-05-21)
Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 67M: 32 (Estimated completion : 2016-05-21)

[SIZE="4"]
[COLOR="olive"]2[/COLOR] [COLOR="Blue"]3[/COLOR] [COLOR="Red"]4[/COLOR] [COLOR="blue"]3[/COLOR][COLOR="Olive"]2[/COLOR][/SIZE]

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;428251]This is based upon the rate of change of the P90 years on the classic status page:

We are now in new territory. Never before[SUP]*[/SUP] has the estimated date of completion been so soon. The current outlook is for all the first time LL's below 79.3 million to be done by October 9th of 2017.[/QUOTE]We are now under a year and a half from a projected completion. Current projections center around 2017-09-20.

I am curious to know why user "tchiwam" was allocated 150 days to complete the LL test when everyone else around there was allocated 90 days. :confused:

[url]http://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=63000000&exp_hi=67000000&execm=1&exp1=1&extf=1&exdchk=1[/url]

The exponent: [url]http://www.mersenne.org/M66623723[/url]

A bug in the SQL view that calculates categories -- introduced when cat 0 was added.

[QUOTE=Prime95;431009]A bug in the SQL view that calculates categories -- introduced when cat 0 was added.[/QUOTE]

Oh, and that reminds me, I need to update my function that calculates the days-to-expire so it shows up correctly on my test web pages. It's probably showing expirations by the old rules.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;431011]Oh, and that reminds me, I need to update my function that calculates the days-to-expire so it shows up correctly on my test web pages. It's probably showing expirations by the old rules.[/QUOTE]

Are exponents assigned before the rule changes expired according to the old rules?