[QUOTE=Uncwilly;428251]... the classic status page:[/QUOTE]Only one exponent remaining until the 1792K FFT is finished. Assuming the residue matches then that range is finished as soon as vats09 checks it in. [size=1]It is already one day overdue.[/size]

[QUOTE=retina;428258]Only one exponent remaining until the 1792K FFT is finished.[/QUOTE]
Well, for previous FFT sizes:
The 20.4M range went to zero by 2007-12-31
Then 25.35M was zero by 2013-01-07
Then 30.15M went to zero by 2014-02-16

We are presently 4,604 factored exponents away from reaching 3 million factored exponents below 79.3M.

[QUOTE=retina;428258]Only [b][u][i][color=red]n[/color][/i][/u][/b]one exponent[b][u][i][color=red]s[/color][/i][/u][/b] remaining until the 1792K FFT is finished.[/QUOTE]And now done.

Time to merge in another line: [url]http://www.mersenne.org/report_classic/[/url]

[QUOTE=retina;428320]

Time to merge in another line: [url]http://www.mersenne.org/report_classic/[/url][/QUOTE]

Done.

[QUOTE=petrw1;423764]not ....299[/QUOTE]

By the way petrw1, you have an exponent that is likely to expire probably mere hours before you finish:
[URL="http://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=35237537"]http://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=35237537[/URL]

My reckoning shows you have 2 days to go, but it expires in 1 day. I'm only granular to the day, not the hour, and I don't know what time the recycling runs, but just FYI.

EDIT: By the way, this is a perfect case in point of someone getting a cat 1 assignment and taking right up to 60 days to complete (and it may not even finish in time). I don't mean to single you out, I'm sure there was a reason for it in this case... :smile:

EDIT #2: Oh, and also this: [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=35247787"]http://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=35247787[/URL] -- I'm showing you with a real ETA of 4.9 days and expires in 3 days.

My estimates of *actual* progress may be skewed if these recently kicked into high gear in the last couple days.

And if it makes you feel any better, here's an example of a first time check that will expire in 3 days but I estimate it has 6.5 days left to run:
[URL="http://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=64530721"]http://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=64530721[/URL] -- so we have someone who is going to take past 90 days even though they got it as a cat 1 assignment.

Right now between DC and LL, there are 63 cat 1 assignments where I'm predicting the assignment will expire before it's *actually* expected to finish (using my running analysis of check-in progress).

Some are moving so slowly like M35561203 at 0.15% per day that it'll take 420 days to finish, but expires in another 49. I don't know what to say... it only move the bar 0.6% in 4 days...

[QUOTE=Madpoo;428530]By the way petrw1, you have an exponent that is likely to expire probably mere hours before you finish:
[URL="http://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=35237537"]http://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=35237537[/URL]

My reckoning shows you have 2 days to go, but it expires in 1 day. I'm only granular to the day, not the hour, and I don't know what time the recycling runs, but just FYI.

EDIT #2: Oh, and also this: [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=35247787"]http://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=35247787[/URL] -- I'm showing you with a real ETA of 4.9 days and expires in 3 days.

..[/QUOTE]

Guilty
... but I blame the Vegemite (or any other excuses I can think of related to us being in Australia for 5 weeks)
... and I also blame the company that this borged computer lives in for doing such frequent updates/patches that require a reboot ... this PC went off line only a few days after we left
... and I also blame (in a vague and obscure way for EDIT #2) the way estimated completion dates are computed when, in this case 2 cores are doing TF (and doing it fast) and 2 cores are doing DC (and certainly NOT fast).
It seems the rolling average calculation for that CPU is saying:
- TF completed fast: increase it
- DC took much longer; reduce it.
Anyway, to make a long store short the Rolling average is WAY FAST for this PC. That DC will take almost 6 more days.

I don't have easy access to this PC so if they expire will the next checkin punt them? Or will they finish as a N/A DC?

[QUOTE=petrw1;428535]Anyway, to make a long store short the Rolling average is WAY FAST for this PC. That DC will take almost 6 more days.

I don't have easy access to this PC so if they expire will the next checkin punt them? Or will they finish as a N/A DC?[/QUOTE]

Well, last time something like this happened, I created an assignment for myself and just sat on it to allow the original user to finish it without the hassle of it being reassigned to someone, blah blah.

However I recall someone took umbrage at that... don't know why, I didn't poach it, it was more like an administrative extension to the original user.

If I don't do that, someone else will get the assignment when yours expire, but yours will finish just days later and the person who got the new assignment won't figure that out until they turn theirs in as an unnecessary triple-check.

I'm inclined in this case to do the "administrative extension" since I know you really are working the assignments and it'll only miss by a matter of days... doing the extension means we avoid someone else wasting their time on them.

Any input from the peanut gallery?

[QUOTE=Madpoo;428536]Any input from the peanut gallery?[/QUOTE]

Do it.

[QUOTE=chalsall;428540]Do it.[/QUOTE]

Well if you say so, then okay. LOL :smile:

Okay, I created "shadow" assignments to myself for those...

Now, to be clear, I'm NOT going to work on these, I'm just doing that so they don't get reassigned to anyone else and petrw can have these extra couple of days to finish them.

I think last time I did this same thing, I had also done one for an exponent that was abandoned and I pre-reserved it for myself, and I think that's what someone took issue with, like I'm hogging all the good stuff...but this ain't that. :smile:

[QUOTE=Madpoo;428543]Now, to be clear, I'm NOT going to work on these, I'm just doing that so they don't get reassigned to anyone else and petrw can have these extra couple of days to finish them.[/QUOTE]

At the end of the day, it doesn't really matter that much. But a recycled DC _does_ mean wasted cycles.

Perhaps when petrw1 is next in front of that borged machine he will configure it such that it doesn't get Cat 1 assignments....