[QUOTE=Mark Rose;418217][url=http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=46842001&full=1]M46842001[/url] could use a triple check :)[/QUOTE]

Mine. Will be about a week.

[QUOTE=chalsall;418239]Mine. Will be about a week.[/QUOTE]

Totally posted that in the wrong thread. It's been a crazy week.

Figured that this would be a fine time to capture this:

All exponents below [COLOR="Blue"][B]34,770,721[/B][/COLOR] have been tested and double-checked.
All exponents below [COLOR="Blue"][B]58,970,231[/B][/COLOR] have been tested at least once.

Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 59M: [COLOR="Red"][B]1 [/B][/COLOR](Estimated completion : [COLOR="Green"]2015-11-28[/COLOR])
Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 60M: [B][COLOR="red"]12[/COLOR][/B] (Estimated completion : [COLOR="Green"]2015-12-24[/COLOR])
Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 61M: [B][COLOR="red"]97[/COLOR][/B] (Estimated completion : [COLOR="Green"]2016-02-05[/COLOR])
Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 62M: [COLOR="red"][B]220[/B][/COLOR] (Estimated completion : [COLOR="green"]2016-02-05[/COLOR])
Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 63M: [COLOR="red"][B]427[/B][/COLOR] (Estimated completion : [COLOR="green"]2016-02-06[/COLOR])

Countdown to double-checking all exponents below 35M: [COLOR="Red"][B]302[/B][/COLOR] (Estimated completion : [COLOR="green"]2016-01-22[/COLOR])


The next 3 months should be quite exciting!

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;418414]Figured that this would be a fine time to capture this:

All exponents below [COLOR="Blue"][B]34,770,721[/B][/COLOR] have been tested and double-checked.
All exponents below [COLOR="Blue"][B]58,970,231[/B][/COLOR] have been tested at least once.

Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 59M: [COLOR="Red"][B]1 [/B][/COLOR](Estimated completion : [COLOR="Green"]2015-11-28[/COLOR])
Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 60M: [B][COLOR="red"]12[/COLOR][/B] (Estimated completion : [COLOR="Green"]2015-12-24[/COLOR])
Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 61M: [B][COLOR="red"]97[/COLOR][/B] (Estimated completion : [COLOR="Green"]2016-02-05[/COLOR])
Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 62M: [COLOR="red"][B]220[/B][/COLOR] (Estimated completion : [COLOR="green"]2016-02-05[/COLOR])
Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 63M: [COLOR="red"][B]427[/B][/COLOR] (Estimated completion : [COLOR="green"]2016-02-06[/COLOR])

Countdown to double-checking all exponents below 35M: [COLOR="Red"][B]302[/B][/COLOR] (Estimated completion : [COLOR="green"]2016-01-22[/COLOR])


The next 3 months should be quite exciting![/QUOTE]

Evidently, the past month (November) should have been equally exciting! Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 59M: [COLOR="Red"][B]1 [/B][/COLOR](Estimated completion : [COLOR="Green"]2015-[SIZE="4"]11-28[/SIZE][/COLOR])

[QUOTE=rudy235;418443]Evidently, the past month (November) should have been equally exciting! Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 59M: [COLOR="Red"][B]1 [/B][/COLOR](Estimated completion : [COLOR="Green"]2015-[SIZE="4"]11-28[/SIZE][/COLOR])[/QUOTE]

The user probably gave up on it. Hasn't checked in for about 4 weeks. I don't know what the expiration rule is for it but it'll be recycled pretty soon I think. Looks like it'll happen 60 days since it was last heard, or 90 days since it was assigned (since it's a "class 1" exponent) from which means recycling around January 2 or so, going by the 90 days since assignment criterion.

[size=3][b]Four[/b][/size]
[QUOTE]
Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 60M: 4 (Estimated completion : 2015-12-25)
[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=cuBerBruce;419603][SIZE=3][B]Four[/B][/SIZE][/QUOTE]
mprime reports an ETA of 23d for mine.

[QUOTE=blip;419640]mprime reports an ETA of 23d for mine.[/QUOTE]

Oh well... it must report the estimated time funny?

That remaining 58M exponent will have to expire, get reassigned, and then completed anyway, and I'm not sure how much longer it'll be before it expires. I think I said early January previously? Something like that.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;419654]Oh well... it must report the estimated time funny?

[/QUOTE]
Yes. That's what I pointed to [URL="http://mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=20679"]here[/URL].

[QUOTE=Madpoo;419654]I think I said early January previously? Something like that.[/QUOTE]

Aaron, I assume you're going to "poach" this such that you don't submit your results until just before or just after it's expired but before it's reassigned?

It would be a shame for this to take another 60+ days for a single hold-up of a mini-milestone to be "off the books", while at the same time a shame if multiple people "did the job".

He probably already knows it's prime :grin: