[QUOTE=petrw1;243119]But only 21 that are needed per [URL]http://www.mersenne.org/primenet/[/URL][/QUOTE]
This is assigned tests. I am presuming that this includes triple checks or something similar. I am yet to get an official answer from someone in the know.

So what's the status on the countdown
mentioned in the OP?

Twin Milestones for Christmas
 

December 25, 2010: All exponents below M(32582657) tested at least once.

December 25, 2010: All exponents below M(37156667) tested at least once.

Looks like the single remaining test was poached by ANONYMOUS.

[QUOTE=NBtarheel_33;243265]December 25, 2010: All exponents below M(32582657) tested at least once.

December 25, 2010: All exponents below M(37156667) tested at least once.

Looks like the single remaining test was poached by ANONYMOUS.[/QUOTE]

That anon bloke has got a lot to answer for.
Should be strung up.
Who is he?

[quote]December 25, 2010: All exponents below M(32582657) tested at least once.

December 25, 2010: All exponents below M(37156667) tested at least once.

Looks like the single remaining test was poached by ANONYMOUS.[/quote]And exactly what newer milestone will that test prove? I can guess, but I'd
rather know.

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;241545]How about MM127?[/QUOTE]

Oh yes, M100, M200, MM127,MM65537,MM1000000,etc.

Milestones galore forever !

BTW When those two exponents are checked, what will we know?

[QUOTE=davieddy;243270][QUOTE=NBtarheel_33;243265]Looks like the single remaining test was poached by ANONYMOUS.[/QUOTE]That anon bloke has got a lot to answer for.
< snip >
Who is he?[/QUOTE]Someone who knows the prices of everything, but the value of nothing.

If you were referring to ANONYMOUS, sure.

Otherwise, not so sure.

[QUOTE=davar55;243571]If you were referring to ANONYMOUS, sure.[/QUOTE]I thought it was obvious that my comment was in response to your question about ANONYMOUS. I quoted your question "Who is he?" from your post #147, then wrote my answer directly underneath that.

Quoted question, then answer.

I guess I could've put "He is ..." at the beginning of my answer. Would that have been sufficiently clear?

[quote]Otherwise, not so sure.[/quote]I've added more quotation. Maybe that will lessen the possibility of confusion.

It was davied.y not davar55 who asked who is he.

You answered him, and I didn't get the referent.

Okay, okay, I'll take the prescription to an optician tomorrow. :embarrassed:


(Why don't I get the smilies menu when I click on "[[U]More[/U]]"?