![]() |
(10^6253*4+11)/3 is 3-PRP! (17.7413s+0.0009s)
|
[QUOTE=lorgix;234621](10^6253*4+11)/3 is 3-PRP! (17.7413s+0.0009s)[/QUOTE]
If it takes 17 seconds to test a 6254-digit number... That's a rather slow comp you have; 18333*10^6253+1 is 3-PRP! (0.7094s+0.0003s) |
[QUOTE=3.14159;234699]If it takes 17 seconds to test a 6254-digit number...
That's a rather slow comp you have; 18333*10^6253+1 is 3-PRP! (0.7094s+0.0003s)[/QUOTE] yeah my CPU is obsolete 3 years ago i think and mine can do it in under 3 lol |
I wonder what the smallest factors of 2^2^2^6+1, or 2^2^64+1, or 2^18446744073709551616 + 1 are.
Oh.. 2634732075339197803231444993 divides 2^18446744073709551616 + 1 How about.. 2^2^2^10+1? |
[QUOTE=3.14159;234717]How about.. 2^2^2^10+1?[/QUOTE]
None known. [QUOTE=3.14159;234717]I wonder what the smallest factors of 2^2^2^6+1, or 2^2^64+1, or 2^18446744073709551616 + 1 are. Oh.. 2634732075339197803231444993 divides 2^18446744073709551616 + 1[/QUOTE] Known since 1986. |
[QUOTE=3.14159;234699]If it takes 17 seconds to test a 6254-digit number...
That's a rather slow comp you have; 18333*10^6253+1 is 3-PRP! (0.7094s+0.0003s)[/QUOTE] I don't remember, but I'm assuming I was running at least Prime95 at the same time. |
I say that you lie. Now, back to looking for a prime.. k * 12^13450 + 1 sounds suitable.
Let's say I wanted to find the last 10 or 15 digits of 41 ↑↑ 6, or 41^(41^(41^(41^(41^41)))). I only know that this definitely ends in 41. Is it similar to 3, which has a certain ending, 9387, whenever one finds the last digits of 3^3^3^3^3^3^3^3^3^... ? Okay; Now I extended that to 641. 41 ↑↑ 6 ends in 641. |
[QUOTE=3.14159;234843]I say that you lie. Now, back to looking for a prime.. k * 12^13450 + 1 sounds suitable.
Let's say I wanted to find the last 10 or 15 digits of 41 ↑↑ 6, or 41^(41^(41^(41^(41^41)))). I only know that this definitely ends in 41. Is it similar to 3, which has a certain ending, 9387, whenever one finds the last digits of 3^3^3^3^3^3^3^3^3^... ? Okay; Now I extended that to 641. 41 ↑↑ 6 ends in 641.[/QUOTE] Are you claiming to know what I remember, or are you claiming to know what I assume? :smile: |
115065 * 12[sup]13450[/sup] + 1 (14521 digits)
Verification: Primality testing 115065*12^13450+1 [N-1, Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge] Running N-1 test using base 7 Special modular reduction using zero-padded FFT length 6K on 115065*12^13450+1 Calling Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge with factored part 55.77% 115065*12^13450+1 is prime! (5.2899s+0.0017s) |
An interesting form of prime;
2 ^ 5 * 3 ^ 662 * 5 ^ 332 * 7 ^ 331 * 11 ^ 332 + 1 (1175 digits) |
11581*54^16970+1 (29403 digits)
Verification: Primality testing 11581*54^16970+1 [N-1, Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge] Running N-1 test using base 5 Special modular reduction using zero-padded FFT length 12K on 11581*54^16970+1 Running N-1 test using base 7 Special modular reduction using zero-padded FFT length 12K on 11581*54^16970+1 Calling Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge with factored part 82.61% 11581*54^16970+1 is prime! (45.9335s+0.0930s) |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 15:01. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.