![]() |
[QUOTE=3.14159;232387]I remember a conjecture that reads:
"There is always a prime number between an integer n and its double." [/QUOTE] It's proven already for a long time. See [url=http://mathworld.wolfram.com/BertrandsPostulate.html]here[/url] and [url=http://tan.epfl.ch/~rhoades/Notes/bertrandPostulate.pdf]here[/url]. |
Submissions: 13736*14256^1960+1 (8146 digits)
Verification: Primality testing 13736*14256^1960+1 [N-1, Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge] Running N-1 test using base 5 Special modular reduction using zero-padded FFT length 6K on 13736*14256^1960+1 Calling Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge with factored part 45.92% 13736*14256^1960+1 is prime! (3.1291s+0.0009s) 11878*4820^4820+1 (17757 digits) Verification: Primality testing 11878*4820^4820+1 [N-1, Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge] Running N-1 test using base 3 Special modular reduction using zero-padded FFT length 12K on 11878*4820^4820+1 Calling Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge with factored part 64.66% 11878*4820^4820+1 is prime! (15.1218s+0.0013s) |
Submissions: 157021*2^48960+1 (14744 digits)
Verification: Primality testing 157021*2^48960+1 [N-1, Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge] Running N-1 test using base 3 Special modular reduction using all-complex FFT length 4K on 157021*2^48960+1 Calling Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge with factored part 99.97% 157021*2^48960+1 is prime! (3.2654s+0.0006s) |
I found something interesting about odd numbers:
n^(10^n) = 1 mod 10^n, where n is odd and where n =/= 5. Ex: 3^10000000 = 1 mod 10000000. And, if this is true, 7^(10^3200) = 1 mod (10^3200) P.S: 7^(10^3200) ≈ 10^(8.45098040014256830712216258592 * 10^3199) Also; Since you thought you had found a divisor of (10^10^200) + 1, try 10^(10^6400) + 1. .. And, I think the divisor axn posted was incorrect. I asked for a factor of 10^10^200 + 1. He provided the smallest factor of 10^[B]2^200[/B] + 1, which is 267 * 2^202 + 1. So.. I revoke the newer challenge.. And my original one stands, and there are still no known factors for 10[sup]10[sup]200[/sup][/sup] + 1. Nevermind.. It has an algebraic factor of 10^2^200+1 |
Are there any Wilson primes > 563? (Prime such that p^2 divides (p-1)! + 1.)
It's all pretty trivial with a multiplier k; 83^2 | 1661 * 82! + 1. |
Another small Generalized Fermat just popped out of my ad hoc search:
4 · 83[SUP]236470[/SUP]+1 :w00t: |
Goddammit. No one will be able to compete with that.
453805 digits. Prove that it is prime. |
[QUOTE=3.14159;232525]Prove that it is prime.[/QUOTE]
Watch [URL="http://primes.utm.edu/primes/page.php?id=95243"]this[/URL] space. |
Submissions: 13241*396^3585+1 (9317 digits)
Primality testing 13241*396^3585+1 [N-1, Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge] Running N-1 test using base 5 Special modular reduction using zero-padded FFT length 5K on 13241*396^3585+1 Calling Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge with factored part 40.07% 13241*396^3585+1 is prime! (3.3585s+0.0026s) |
Submissions: 573382*1999^11700+1 (38626 digits)
Verification: Primality testing 573382*1999^11700+1 [N-1, Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge] Running N-1 test using base 5 Special modular reduction using zero-padded FFT length 24K on 573382*1999^11700+1 Calling Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge with factored part 99.99% 573382*1999^11700+1 is prime! (64.2295s+0.0029s) 30842*396^6585+1 (17111 digits) Verification: Primality testing 30842*396^6585+1 [N-1, Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge] Running N-1 test using base 5 Special modular reduction using zero-padded FFT length 8K on 30842*396^6585+1 Running N-1 test using base 13 Special modular reduction using zero-padded FFT length 8K on 30842*396^6585+1 Calling Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge with factored part 40.08% 30842*396^6585+1 is prime! (16.9682s+0.0010s) Both entries for item 2. |
Something that hasn't been done in a long time;
Submission for item 20: 35523*396^6585 + 1 (17111 digits) (Proved using Proth.exe) 35523*396^6585 + 1 may be prime. (a = 2) 35523*396^6585 + 1 is prime! (a = 7) [17111 digits] |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 22:31. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.