by the way CRG [url]http://oeis.org/classic/A138576[/url] are the sums of inside the parentheses for 2^1.

[QUOTE=3.14159;227711]No! The sequence applies to all b!



Well, you stated that this happened to you as well, which makes me doubt that it happens to be only me.

And, it only [SPOILER]fucks[/SPOILER] up when dealing with k * 308[sup]308[/sup] + 1. There have been no other errors before or afterwards. I'm going to test the original Primeform to make sure that this is just a minor problem.[/QUOTE]

this would be more appropriate.

Tested the original Primeform, there seems to be no issue. Luckily, I missed no primes.

[QUOTE=science_man_88]this would be more appropriate.
[/QUOTE]

Swearwords. Big deal. Everyone uses them.

[QUOTE=3.14159;227711]No! The sequence applies to all b![/QUOTE]

So the sequence you're thinking of is the primes themselves?

[QUOTE=3.14159;227711]Well, you stated that this happened to you as well, which makes me doubt that it happens to be only me.

And, it only fucks up when dealing with k * 308[sup]308[/sup] + 1. There have been no other errors before or afterwards. I'm going to test the original Primeform to make sure that this is just a minor problem.[/QUOTE]

I tend to agree, but mdettweiler's advice is good -- better be sure.

[QUOTE=3.14159;227715]Tested the original Primeform, there seems to be no issue. Luckily, I missed no primes.



Swearwords. Big deal. Everyone uses them.[/QUOTE]

I only remember using them around family the people that make me most mad most days.

[QUOTE=CRGreathouse]So the sequence you're thinking of is the primes themselves?
[/QUOTE]

Not at all. I was thinking of the k-values, 1 to 10000, for the b values, and the sequence would be the k-values for b = 60; Followed by k-values for b = 61, b = 62, b = 63, etc,

[QUOTE=3.14159;227715]Swearwords. Big deal. Everyone uses them.[/QUOTE]

I have to admit, the idea of an innocent child wading through [b]eleven hundred pages[/b] of reasonably complicated math to learn a swear word is fairly amusing to me.

[QUOTE=3.14159;227720]Not at all. I was thinking of the k-values, 1 to 10000, for the b values, and the sequence would be the k-values for b = 60; Followed by k-values for b = 61, b = 62, b = 63, etc,[/QUOTE]

That seems pretty contrived, I don't know that you should submit that. Maybe the k-values by antidiagonals? But even so, the n >= 60 restriction seems unnatural.

[QUOTE=CRGreathouse]I have to admit, the idea of an innocent child wading through [B]eleven hundred pages[/B] of reasonably complicated math to learn a swear word is fairly amusing to me.
[/QUOTE]

Would a kid even bother flipping through 1100 pages of math anyway?

[QUOTE=CRGreathouse]That seems pretty contrived, I don't know that you should submit that. Maybe the k-values by antidiagonals? But even so, the n >= 60 restriction seems unnatural.
[/QUOTE]

So you suggest I use b = 2 as a starting point?

[QUOTE=3.14159;227723]Would a kid even bother flipping through 1100 pages of math anyway?[/QUOTE]

Would a kid read even one?

[QUOTE=CRGreathouse]Would a kid read even one?
[/QUOTE]

Only if it were basic arithmetic.