mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   Lone Mersenne Hunters (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Perhaps the independent LMHs should claim ranges? (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=13593)

chalsall 2010-07-19 13:48

[QUOTE=petrw1;221930]Just noticed you were working in the 176-177M ranges....
I was kindof hoping you would leave the 100M range to those will small PCs.[/QUOTE]

Only for a few hours... Had to do an emergency server upgrade, so I redirected my proxy domain's A record to CNAME to PrimeNet so my cluster could keep working.

petrw1 2010-07-19 15:11

[QUOTE=chalsall;221961]Only for a few hours... Had to do an emergency server upgrade, so I redirected my proxy domain's A record to CNAME to PrimeNet so my cluster could keep working.[/QUOTE]

NP....I will take the following as evidence of server maintenance.

[CODE]The Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search
Visualization Tool

Updated: 1970.01.01 00:00 UTC[/CODE]

chalsall 2010-07-27 14:00

[QUOTE=chalsall;221614]I would like to next reserve 710M to 730M and 650M to 680M.[/QUOTE]

OK. These ranges will be finished in about 30 hours.

I would like to next reserve 610M to 650M, which will take me about five days to complete.

chalsall 2010-08-04 00:27

[QUOTE=chalsall;223057]I would like to next reserve 610M to 650M, which will take me about five days to complete.[/QUOTE]

OK. This range is now complete.

Since there's nothing left above 198M at 63 "bits" not claimed and/or reserved by others, my cluster has begun regular LMH-TF and DC work.

It's been fun guys.... :smile:

Uncwilly 2010-08-04 01:57

[QUOTE=chalsall;223951]Since there's nothing left above 198M at 63 "bits" not claimed and/or reserved by others, my cluster has begun regular LMH-TF and [B][COLOR="Green"]DC work[/COLOR][/B].[/QUOTE]Nice.:george:

petrw1 2010-08-04 02:16

[QUOTE=chalsall;223951]OK. This range is now complete.

Since there's nothing left above 198M at 63 "bits" not claimed and/or reserved by others, my cluster has begun regular LMH-TF and DC work.

It's been fun guys.... :smile:[/QUOTE]

Another milestone....congrats....and yes it has been fun.

RIP - 32 bit architecture :cry:

chalsall 2010-08-04 17:23

[QUOTE=petrw1;223955]RIP - 32 bit architecture :cry:[/QUOTE]

Not that that is necessarily a bad thing, IMHO...

Just so you all know, I've invested a bit of work over the "Crop Over" long weekend here in Bim, and have implemented SNMP on all my clients' machines where I have a Linux machine I can use for SNMP "Gets". ("SpeedFan" and "SpeedFan SNMP Extension" for anyone interested. Bloody M$ don't expose such machine-health data natively.)

Thus, I'm able to bring approximately 150 cores over to DC work, rather than just 75, leaving most of the last of the 63 -> 64 "bit" factoring work to others.

lycorn 2010-08-09 00:56

[QUOTE=chalsall;224053]

Thus, I'm able to bring approximately 150 cores over to DC work, rather than just 75[/QUOTE]

Now that´s good news!

Uncwilly 2010-10-29 02:40

1 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE=chalsall;223951]Since there's nothing left above 198M at 63 "bits" not claimed and/or reserved by others, my cluster has begun regular LMH-TF and DC work.[/QUOTE]Can I put in a small request?
What do you think about having you cluster working on range from 332,400,000 to 332,999,999? Just marching them up one bit level at a time until what ever level suits you, maybe 70. Then working on the 333,xxx,xxx range.

In he attached, you can see the percentage of exponents that have been factored out. I would love to drive that up for the early parts of the 100M digit range.

:smile:

chalsall 2010-11-01 17:00

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;234722]Can I put in a small request? What do you think about having you cluster working on range from 332,400,000 to 332,999,999? Just marching them up one bit level at a time until what ever level suits you, maybe 70. Then working on the 333,xxx,xxx range.[/QUOTE]

OK. I've configured my cluster controller to spend part of its time to begin by bringing 332.7M to 333M up to 67, and 333M to 334M up to 66.

Uncwilly 2010-11-01 17:36

[QUOTE=chalsall;235231]OK. I've configured my cluster controller to spend part of its time to begin by bringing 332.7M to 333M up to 67, and 333M to 334M up to 66.[/QUOTE]Cool, I have noticed this.


All times are UTC. The time now is 13:24.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.