![]() |
Taking Riesel base 1025 (8*1025^n-1) to n=100000
|
[quote=gd_barnes;212917]It doesn't appear that my laptop will download them. If I wasn't out of town, I'd look for the correct compression software and learn something about the settings but I don't have time right now.
Can you Email them to gbarnes017 at gmail dot com? That's the best way for medium and large-sized files. Thanks.[/quote] Seems they're PRPnet results anyway--I can open 7z files, so I'll just process them and send them to you. |
Reserving R625 to n=10K as new.
|
R928
Primes found:
[code] 6357*928^15040-1 6567*928^15115-1 9387*928^15142-1 1103*928^15193-1 1292*928^15244-1 4271*928^15247-1 19884*928^15433-1 29661*928^15530-1 5534*928^15747-1 5127*928^15878-1 23600*928^15901-1 30956*928^15933-1 19911*928^15954-1 26217*928^15995-1 14612*928^16075-1 5756*928^16082-1 8282*928^16106-1 15663*928^16128-1 11388*928^16148-1 5966*928^16211-1 20831*928^16206-1 4853*928^16245-1 16518*928^16256-1 31133*928^16290-1 28632*928^16371-1 18173*928^16409-1 21555*928^16425-1 16043*928^16502-1 28086*928^16565-1 7001*928^17075-1 4664*928^17127-1 [/code] I am ending my effort on this base. If anyone wants a file with the remaining candidates for n < 25000, let me know. |
[quote=rogue;213035]I am ending my effort on this base. If anyone wants a file with the remaining candidates for n < 25000, let me know.[/quote]
If you could post the file here or email it to Gary, he can upload it to the CRUS web pages--that's generally where we put sieve files for unreserved ranges so that they're in a central, easily accessible place. |
Riesel base 947, k=80.
Primes: 2*947^54-1 6*947^3-1 8*947^2-1 10*947^3-1 14*947^40-1 18*947^6-1 20*947^2-1 22*947^89-1 24*947^1-1 26*947^2-1 28*947^3-1 30*947^1-1 32*947^6-1 36*947^5-1 38*947^28-1 40*947^1-1 42*947^106-1 46*947^3-1 48*947^2-1 50*947^14-1 52*947^9-1 54*947^1-1 58*947^79-1 60*947^8-1 62*947^8-1 64*947^1-1 66*947^1-1 68*947^4-1 70*947^31-1 72*947^25-1 76*947^1-1 16*947^8931-1 4*947^10055-1 1k's remain: 74*947^n-1 Trivially factors: k=12,34,44,56,78. Base completed to 25K and released. I'll not start the new bases in 501-1024 range, just report bases which are already done. |
1 Attachment(s)
Riesel base 653, k=110.
Primes attached. 6k's remain: 4*653^n-1 32*653^n-1 58*653^n-1 64*653^n-1 82*653^n-1 88*653^n-1 Base completed to 25K and released. |
[quote=rogue;212945]Taking Riesel base 1025 (8*1025^n-1) to n=100000[/quote]
Hey! How'd that one get in there? lmao I bet no one knew that I snuck that one on to the web pages several months ago without uttering a word about it. I know, I know, went against the project there and what I've been complaining about the last several weeks. Only us annoying admins can do that. There might even be a couple of more of them just like that on the pages, all done several months ago. Don't anyone get any wise ideas now. :smile: |
[QUOTE=gd_barnes;213196]Hey! How'd that one get in there? lmao
I bet no one knew that I snuck that one on to the web pages several months ago without uttering a word about it. I know, I know, went against the project there and what I've been complaining about the last several weeks. Only us annoying admins can do that. There might even be a couple of more of them just like that on the pages, all done several months ago. Don't anyone get any wise ideas now. :smile:[/QUOTE] Hmm, I never noticed. I'll do it anyways. |
[quote=henryzz;212724]serp bases 784, 785 and 788 are all tested to 50k and unreserving
results attached to fit in the forum limit i had to compress using 7zip with customised settings(ultra wasnt good enough) if you can't uncompress it i can reupload somewhere else[/quote] David, quick question about these: do the sieve files included correspond with the depth at which the PRP testing was done? I'm running into problems matching up the results with the sieve files and my first guess would be that there've been factors removed since. If that's the case, could you send me the original sieve files at the same depth at which you did PRP testing? Thanks. :smile: |
[quote=mdettweiler;213461]David, quick question about these: do the sieve files included correspond with the depth at which the PRP testing was done? I'm running into problems matching up the results with the sieve files and my first guess would be that there've been factors removed since. If that's the case, could you send me the original sieve files at the same depth at which you did PRP testing? Thanks. :smile:[/quote]
it's complex i first inputed undersieved files to the server and several times at unknown depths(of testing) used the remove candidates with factors from sieve file feature of prpnet i can provide the factor files i used to remove the factors i don't think i have the first set of undersieved files the reason that i started with undersieved files was that i expected to find some primes(and didn't find as many as i thought(wrongly)) which would speed up sieving lots AFAIK i have provided the most sieved files that i have with all factors removed sorry to cause confusion any idea on how to do this in future? |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 22:58. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.