![]() |
1 Attachment(s)
done.
here is the sieve file and the output. |
and a third post in a row for taking R638, from 50k to 100k.
I forgot to say that nothing were found in my R533 hunt. |
Taking S720, R581, and R619 to n=200000.
|
Update R751
1 Attachment(s)
I found 200 primes (see attachemend) an finished up to n=5835.
I'll continue with this range. |
R507 is complete to n=100000. Here are the found primes:
2974*507^30421-1 2404*507^32960-1 5616*507^33219-1 382*507^35153-1 6206*507^35737-1 11266*507^37654-1 380*507^39828-1 9096*507^41986-1 9686*507^42206-1 10016*507^44737-1 2918*507^45439-1 5276*507^46031-1 10386*507^50385-1 7904*507^51308-1 5884*507^64759-1 2808*507^71920-1 4634*507^80663-1 9276*507^95530-1 4124*507^98983-1 I've e-mailed the residues for the other k to Gary. |
[QUOTE=Rincewind;337637]I found 200 primes (see attachemend) an finished up to n=5835.
I'll continue with this range.[/QUOTE] Are you sure that you want to keep this reserved to n=25K? It took you 2 months to do n=2500-5800. At that rate, it would likely take you 1-2 years to get it to n=25K. |
1 Attachment(s)
R968 is complete to n=250K
R514 is complete to n=200K R601, R780, R783 are complete to n=100K No primes except one for R783 that was previously reported. Residues attached. Reserving R883, R889 to n=100K. |
[QUOTE=gd_barnes;338221]Are you sure that you want to keep this reserved to n=25K? It took you 2 months to do n=2500-5800. At that rate, it would likely take you 1-2 years to get it to n=25K.[/QUOTE]
I don't test 24/7. I'd like to keep this range, because there are plenty ranges and conjectures which are free to be reserved by other contributors and I don't see a reason why I should cancel this conjecture. I can cut the range down to a smaller n-value. If you think I should cancel the this range or reduce the n-value feel free to contact me. |
[QUOTE=Rincewind;338420]I don't test 24/7. I'd like to keep this range, because there are plenty ranges and conjectures which are free to be reserved by other contributors and I don't see a reason why I should cancel this conjecture. I can cut the range down to a smaller n-value. If you think I should cancel the this range or reduce the n-value feel free to contact me.[/QUOTE]
No problem. I just wanted to make sure that you knew what you were up against. |
That's nice from you, thank you.
So I'll keep the range and if someone really wants this range I'llmunreserve it. |
R836
R836 tested n=100K-200K - nothing found
Results emailed - Base released |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 23:16. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.