![]() |
[quote=kar_bon;223550]Sorry for that, but I was not aware of this! There's no reservation on the Sierp-page![/quote]
But I see it, it's right there on the [URL]http://www.noprimeleftbehind.net/crus/Sierp-conjecture-reserves.htm[/URL] page... |
[QUOTE=mdettweiler;223551]But I see it, it's right there on the [URL]http://www.noprimeleftbehind.net/crus/Sierp-conjecture-reserves.htm[/URL] page...[/QUOTE]
I only looked on the Cenjecture-page and normally there's a link to the res-page! |
[quote=kar_bon;223552]I only looked on the Cenjecture-page and normally there's a link to the res-page![/quote]
There's only a link when the base is big enough that it has to have its own separate reservation page; smaller bases like this one are just listed directly on the Sierp. Conjecture Reservations page. The exact cutoff is >25 k's for its own page. |
[quote=kar_bon;223552]I only looked on the Cenjecture-page and normally there's a link to the res-page![/quote]
?? What are you smoking there Karsten? lol All reservations are on the reservations pages. That's why they are called reservations pages. There are zero reservations on the main conjecture pages! As Max implied, the main page may or may not have a direct link to the base reservation page, depending on if the base has > 25 k's remaining. Also, I reserved it for him in [URL="http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=221107&postcount=500"]this posting[/URL]. And...I've asked this of people numerous times before: PLEASE reserve bases before starting on them. It's possible that Max reserved this after you started on it. In other words, you may have started on it when there was no reservation for it. The error was in not reserving it to begin with. Had it already been reserved, he would have not reserved it. Anyway, not too much harm done. Max will just test n=50K-100K for one less k instead. Ian: I have updated the 1k/2k/3k listing to show S257 with 2 k's remaining. |
[QUOTE=gd_barnes;223675]What are you smoking there Karsten? lol
[/QUOTE] Yo man, that sh*t is not as it was :grin: Ok, my bad, next time I look there first. What about this: Mark the reserved bases (only bases not the k-values) in the main page, so I could determine this with the script and could show it on the condensed table, too? Marking like a text 'res' or special color would do the trick! |
[quote=kar_bon;223678]Yo man, that sh*t is not as it was :grin:
Ok, my bad, next time I look there first. What about this: Mark the reserved bases (only bases not the k-values) in the main page, so I could determine this with the script and could show it on the condensed table, too? Marking like a text 'res' or special color would do the trick![/quote] Too much effort. Sometimes only specific k's are reserved. Hence the separate reservation pages. |
David,
Can you give a status update on R258? You last had it at n=75K on May 3rd. Thanks. It's the only remaining 1k base < 325 that is at n<100K. |
1 Attachment(s)
[quote=gd_barnes;224146]David,
Can you give a status update on R258? You last had it at n=75K on May 3rd. Thanks. It's the only remaining 1k base < 325 that is at n<100K.[/quote] Hmm. That one seems to have escaped posting. According to the prpnet log it was completed on June 26th. Sorry!! |
[quote=henryzz;224153]Hmm. That one seems to have escaped posting. According to the prpnet log it was completed on June 26th. Sorry!![/quote]
Great. No problem. That's now a very impressive grouping of 1k bases at n=100K! Edit: This makes a good case for keeping and/or backing up all of one's work for up to a year after completion. Thanks for doing that. :-) |
[quote=henryzz;224153]Hmm. That one seems to have escaped posting. According to the prpnet log it was completed on June 26th. Sorry!![/quote]
Are there by chance any other PRPnet results of yours that I haven't yet processed? The only results processing job I have a record of doing for you within the last few months is from the S6 drive, n=314K-316K. |
[quote=mdettweiler;224159]Are there by chance any other PRPnet results of yours that I haven't yet processed? The only results processing job I have a record of doing for you within the last few months is from the S6 drive, n=314K-316K.[/quote]
None except the second batch of serp 6 stuff I just posted. There will be some more in the next few days as I am finishing off the riesel bases with CK<100. If you email me the script I can do the conversion if that would be easier. |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 23:02. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.