[QUOTE=henryzz;200949]Is there a way to forcefully make the FFT length higher to hopefully get a correct result?[/QUOTE]Hummm. Reading the (very short) documentation given with LLR, we cannot. Maybe LLR can understand the .ini options of Prime95 ? I really don't know.
Who knows about LLR ?
Tony

[QUOTE=kar_bon;200950]Maybe another reason:
...
So there's a difference in the LLR versions: V3.7.2 is not corrected to that issue i think![/QUOTE]So, who is Yves ? and who is maintaining LLR now ?
Tony

[QUOTE=T.Rex;200957]So, who is Yves ? and who is maintaining LLR now ?
Tony[/QUOTE]

oh, sorry, i meant Jean!

[QUOTE=rogue;200954]If you are not ....[/QUOTE]Hummm The help of last version of PFGW does not work (file pfgw.txt missing.
How do you do: pfgw -t -q"(2^42737+1)/3" without -t ? (I even don't know what -t means !!)
Isn't there a website dedicated to pfgw where there are explanations ?

So pfgw and LLR share the same gwnum library ?

T.

just new version [url=http://openpfgw.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/openpfgw/pfgw_win_3.2.6_20100105.zip?view=log]here[/url]

docs included in the ZIP-file.

[QUOTE=kar_bon;200961]just new version [url=http://openpfgw.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/openpfgw/pfgw_win_3.2.6_20100105.zip?view=log]here[/url]
docs included in the ZIP-file.[/QUOTE]I'm on Linux... However, the fgpw tool searches for a fgpw.txt file and there is a fgpwdoc.txt file. Is it the same ?
T.

[QUOTE=T.Rex;200960]Hummm The help of last version of PFGW does not work (file pfgw.txt missing.
How do you do: pfgw -t -q"(2^42737+1)/3" without -t ? (I even don't know what -t means !!)
Isn't there a website dedicated to pfgw where there are explanations ?

So pfgw and LLR share the same gwnum library ?

T.[/QUOTE]

If you d/l'd the official release, it has a pfgwdoc.txt file included in the distribution. Remove -t to do a PRP test. -t will try to do a primality test.

PFGW and LLR both use gwnum, but different versions of it.

PFGW 3.2.5 (gwnum 25.13) gives 2 times the same residue for the faulty exponent.

Jean is back !!

[QUOTE=T.Rex;201042]PFGW 3.2.5 (gwnum 25.13) gives 2 times the same residue for the faulty exponent.

Jean is back !![/QUOTE]

Was it just one exponent or a range of exponents? You should check one exponent in Prime95, just to make sure there is no bug there, in worktodo.txt use:

PRP=1,2,<exponent>,1,0,0,"3"

[QUOTE=T.Rex;201042]
Jean is back !![/QUOTE]

Does this mean that you are in contact with him?

[QUOTE=Joe O;201524]Does this mean that you are in contact with him?[/QUOTE]Yes. But Jean is not very talkative ! I think he is working hard on a new version of LLR. Maybe that the problems we have led him to investigate and improve LLR.

BTW, now I've found 5 exponents that generate random Residues through LLR. More are to come, I guess.

One of these days, I'll provide exponent examples. For now, my colleagues and myself keep that confidential.

Tony