![]() |
[QUOTE=ET_;234767]Reaching 2.5 PetaFLOPS with an incrastructure holding 7,000 Intel cores and 14,000 nVidia graphic cpus.[/QUOTE]
The numbers are reversed but who's really counting. :-) |
Also, it's 14336 (14<<10) six-core CPUs (multiplying up to a peak 2.93GHz * 4 FLOP/cycle * 12 cores/box * 7168 boxes of just over one petaflop) and 7168 Fermis - so 7168 boxes each with dual hex-cores and a Fermi. Not a cheap machine: maybe 400 million yuan.
|
Hello!
Why not windows version of mfaktc 0.13? |
[QUOTE=Lorenzo;236759]Hello!
Why not windows version of mfaktc 0.13?[/QUOTE] A version compiled for Windows can be downloaded from here: [url]http://www.sendspace.com/file/obirpl[/url] |
[QUOTE=amphoria;236817]A version compiled for Windows can be downloaded from here:
[URL]http://www.sendspace.com/file/obirpl[/URL][/QUOTE] Thanks a lot. But there is no readme or any other file how you can use it. Or is there a a description somethere in these thread? |
Just take the README.txt from the source tarball. :smile:
Oliver |
[QUOTE=TheJudger;236834]Just take the README.txt from the source tarball. :smile:
Oliver[/QUOTE] Thanks a lot. Found it. ;) |
[QUOTE=amphoria;236817]A version compiled for Windows can be downloaded from here:
[url]http://www.sendspace.com/file/obirpl[/url][/QUOTE] Thank you! |
Thanks for the windows executable.
I've been running it. I have a nvidia 460GTX running on Win7. I've been grabbing TF work manually. On my machine it seems to average about 2GHz-days work per hour. Is that what I should expect? (I think that figure is awesome btw) -- Craig |
[QUOTE=nucleon;237234]Thanks for the windows executable.
I've been running it. I have a nvidia 460GTX running on Win7. I've been grabbing TF work manually. On my machine it seems to average about 2GHz-days work per hour. Is that what I should expect? (I think that figure is awesome btw) [/QUOTE] On a GTX465 (the nearest equivalent I have) I am getting the equivalent of 4.6 GHz days per hour on 100M digit exponent. This is on 64-bit Linux but the difference between Linux and Windows is negligible on v0.13. However, the size of the exponent does matter. If you are testing a smaller exponent then it will run slower. |
Hi Craig,
[QUOTE=nucleon;237234]Thanks for the windows executable. I've been running it. I have a nvidia 460GTX running on Win7. I've been grabbing TF work manually. On my machine it seems to average about 2GHz-days work per hour. Is that what I should expect? (I think that figure is awesome btw) -- Craig[/QUOTE] please provide some more information: - exponent size - bit level(s) - CPU type/clock - settings in mfaktc.ini (if changed from default) When providing performance numbers please copy&paste one or two lines of the mfaktc output starting with "class xxxx:". I'm not thinking in GHz-days. A GTX 460 should provide similar speed to a GTX 465, perhaps a little bit slower. If the CPU ist fast enough you should see something like 150M/sec for a exponent around 100.000.000 at bitlevels about 64. Oliver |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 22:59. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.