![]() |
Sieving Riesel & Sierp base 16
1 Attachment(s)
Hey all,
I'm currently sieving Riesel and Sierp base 16 together for the remaining unreserved k's for n=200K-500K as a slightly lower priority effort. The optimum sieve depth for breaking off n=200K-300K is P=12T. This assumes the very likely possibility that we won't complete testing both drives to n=300K within ~1 year and so only takes into account the rate of factor removal from the n=200K-300K portion of the file; not the entire file. I'm not going to make a formal sieving drive out of it but if anyone would like to help, please post a reservation here. The file sieved to P=8T is attached to this posting. I'll remove factors from it as we progress. It takes one 64-bit 2.4 Ghz core ~5 days to sieve a P=1T range using 64-bit sr2sieve. When we're at P=12T, I'll remove the n=200K-300K part of the file and post some files in the Riesel base 16 drive for testing. When/if we find some more primes on Sierp base 16 before reaching n=200K, I'll remove those k's from the file. We can also continue sieving n=300K-500K as a very low priority effort if anyone wants to. These are good bases to run the much faster-testing power-of-2 bases. Iirc, even with the new PFGW, as a general rule, I've found that they test ~2.5-3 times faster than non-power-of-2 bases for the same size k-value and # of digits. (Yes, the smaller k-values can test much faster than the larger ones, even on non-power-of-2 bases using the new PFGW.) Reservations: [code] gd_barnes P<=3T complete Flatlander P=3T-4T complete gd_barnes P=4T-5T complete Flatlander P=5T-8T complete gd_barnes P=8T-12T complete (Sieving is paused as we break off and test n=200K-300K.) [/code]Gary |
Taking 3T-4T.
Where is the file? |
I wasn't going to post it until I found out if there was any interest. I've now attached it to the 1st posting here. Thanks for helping. :smile:
Gary |
P=2T-3T is done. Taking P=4T-5T.
|
Taking 5T-6T.
|
Taking 6T-7T.
|
1 Attachment(s)
3T-4T is complete.
|
P=4T-5T is complete. I'll reserve more later next week after getting back from a business trip.
|
1 Attachment(s)
5T-6T is complete.
|
1 Attachment(s)
6T-7T is complete.
Taking 7T-8T. |
1 Attachment(s)
7T-8T is complete.
Due to hardware issues I've had to go back to 32bit Windows, so I won't be sieving for a while. |
That's a bummer on having to go to 32 bit. Thanks for the help.
I'll go ahead and reserve P=8T-10T and put it on 2 cores. I'll see if I can get us up to P=12T by mid-month so that we can get the Riesel drive started again. Gary |
P=8T-10T is complete. Reserving P=10T-12T.
BTW, quite some time back, I posted the file sieved to P=8T in the first post here. If anyone is interested in helping, we can go ahead and sieve this range to a few trillion above P=12T. That's optimal if it takes us at least a year to finish testing n=200K-300K on both sides. Since n=300K is n=1.2M base 2, it's quite a bit of work for 43 k's, although the avg. k is very low weight. |
P=10T-12T is complete. The sieving effort is paused as we break off and test n=200K-300K.
|
| All times are UTC. The time now is 08:58. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.