![]() |
Hi ,Karl M Johnson
[QUOTE=Karl M Johnson;290621] The most important detail I forgot to mention - the device flag doesnt work along with "-r" flag, which is the residue test. [/QUOTE] $ CUDALucas -d 1 -r Don't work ? |
1 Attachment(s)
Ver 1.57
Add apsen's work. Ctrl-C handler brought back. checkpoint file write per 100000 iteration. |
[QUOTE=msft;290647]Ver 1.57
Add apsen's work. Ctrl-C handler brought back. checkpoint file write per 100000 iteration.[/QUOTE] Neverending story... I'd prefer checkpoint every 10000 to 100000, best woulb be configurable, Will compile in 12 hours again. |
[QUOTE=Brain;290674]Neverending story... I'd prefer checkpoint every 10000 to 100000, best woulb be configurable, Will compile in 12 hours again.[/QUOTE]
Anyway Ctrl-C signal make checkpoint file. Only use every 10000 checkpoint file,When system crash!!! |
[QUOTE=Brain;290674]Neverending story... I'd prefer checkpoint every 10000 to 100000, best woulb be configurable, Will compile in 12 hours again.[/QUOTE]
Understand. I add -c option,and Brain compile 12 hour later. PS. I catch sign from gpuLucas. |
I don't get it, the v1.3alpha_eoc output format was PERFECT. The -c switch [B]worked nice[/B], with any number of iterations, it shows the [B]ETA[/B], the [B]REAL spent time[/B], the ms/iter with 4 ([B]FOUR[/B]) decimals... etc. (a small problem scrambling residues, however).
Why can't you guys copy the i/o stuff from there?:surprised |
[QUOTE=msft;290645]Hi ,Karl M Johnson
$ CUDALucas -d 1 -r Don't work ?[/QUOTE] That works. So the program wants device flag first, then everything else. It's perfectly fine, since it's stated if you run CUDALucas without any flags. Case closed. |
1 Attachment(s)
Ver 1.58
LaurV's Functional specification. |
[QUOTE=msft;290705]Ver 1.58
LaurV's Functional specification.[/QUOTE] Billion thanks! ([URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dkhZhCryX0&feature=related"]link[/URL]). I am dying to reach home (in few hours) after work to give it a try! |
[QUOTE=LaurV;290693]I don't get it, the v1.3alpha_eoc output format was PERFECT. The -c switch [B]worked nice[/B], with any number of iterations, it shows the [B]ETA[/B], the [B]REAL spent time[/B], the ms/iter with 4 ([B]FOUR[/B]) decimals... etc. (a small problem scrambling residues, however).
Why can't you guys copy the i/o stuff from there?:surprised[/QUOTE] @LaurV: You sound a bit rude, without msft, we would have nothing! Ahh, the thanks compensates it.... @msft: Your enduring work is very appreciated... Case closed. |
[QUOTE=Brain;290715]@LaurV: You sound a bit rude.[/QUOTE]
You should know me better after an year of "forumming" around... My rudeness is usually expressed by completely ignoring the threads. If I started arguing about something, that means I care about it, and I want to see it a better product... For example yafu evolved to the actual form partially due to my rudeness in the yafu thread. I stepped on bsquared toes until he got pissed of me :D How can you be offended by a guy from the internet, which you don't know, and he doesn't know you for real? People tell a lot of sheesh... by the way, any binaries? :P:P |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 23:09. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.