[QUOTE=Ethan (EO);273809]Woohoo -- I just got a matching residue from 1.3alpha_eoc w/ msft's previous double check of 101001001 :D Unfortunately, the manual results submission form is acting strangely for me, so it's not visible on primenet yet. But this is a great result for the reliability of GPUs for this task!

Ethan[/QUOTE]

Might this explain it? :big grin:

[QUOTE=Prime95;273550]You can't use CudaLUCAS to double-check an exponent that was first-time tested with CudaLUCAS.[/QUOTE]

It's already been Double Checked, it's just PrimeNet doesn't accept unassigned triple checks because they're completely redundant.

[QUOTE=Dubslow;273816]It's already been Double Checked, it's just PrimeNet doesn't accept unassigned triple checks because they're completely redundant.[/QUOTE]

I have no idea what exponent you're looking at.

[code]
Unverified LL FDD1FBABAB6840__ by "Serge Batalov" on 2009-09-09
Unverified LL 03656AE02E5117__ by "msft" on 2011-01-16
[/code]

[QUOTE=Dubslow;273816]It's already been Double Checked, it's just PrimeNet doesn't accept unassigned triple checks because they're completely redundant.[/QUOTE]

Yeah, mine was assigned -- the assignment was removed when I submitted the result, but (properly, I think) I didn't get credit since msft's check was with a previous version of cudalucas, which doesn't support arbitrary shifts and is relatively untested.

Soo... until we get an independent check of the exponent this remains unverified. But regardless of whether or not the residue is actually correct, msft and I matched which means about 70days worth of GPU time between our two tests w/o an error that propagated to the final residue.

[QUOTE=Ethan (EO);273827]Soo... until we get an independent check of the exponent this remains unverified.[/QUOTE]

If Serge still has his interim checkpoint files ([url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=187713&postcount=92[/url]) and there is a way to utilize them, this triple-and-a-half check could happen relatively quickly.

My bad. I (in stupid form) assumed it was a 10M exponent that had already been verified. In which case my statement stands, regardless of its complete irrelevance to this thread.

Short question
 

[QUOTE=Ethan (EO);273827]Soo... until we get an independent check of the exponent this remains unverified. [/QUOTE]
I don't wanna misdirect the thread, so a short answer would be sufficient. Does PrimeNet avoid that a first-time test done by CUDALucas is being double-checked also via CUDALucas (client with zero shift count)? I didn't dare to try it via the manual assignments page... ;-)

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam: My PC is laggy with 1.3 eoc_alpha. Please consider my artificial wait time suggestion.

[QUOTE=Brain;273888] I didn't dare to try it via the manual assignments page... ;-)
.[/QUOTE]

[URL="http://browse.dict.cc/latein-deutsch/Scio+me+nihil+scire.html"]Scio me nihil scire. [Sokrates], [SIZE=2]Ich weiß das ich nichts weiß[/SIZE][/URL]

My LL's with CudaLucas 1.2 Linux64
M( 51936263 )C, 0x38dd7484726e3e__, n = 4194304, CUDALucas v1.2
M( 51936497 )C, 0xb82288045ea6a6__, n = 4194304, CUDALucas v1.2
M( 50217379 )C, 0x4210ec3d177ace__, n = 4194304, CUDALucas v1.2
M( 50217353 )C, 0x3deb7d340b18d6__, n = 4194304, CUDALucas v1.2
M( 50636153 )C, 0xff505235830084__, n = 4194304, CUDALucas v1.2
M( 47842481 )C, 0xd6924545a79e19__, n = 4194304, CUDALucas v1.2

My DC's with CudaLucas 1.2 Linux64
M( 25891057 )C, 0x4f4f587fdd4d3c__, n = 2097152, CUDALucas v1.2

[QUOTE=Brain;273888]Does PrimeNet avoid that a first-time test done by CUDALucas is being double-checked also via CUDALucas (client with zero shift count)? I didn't dare to try it via the manual assignments page... ;-)[/QUOTE]

Feel free to use the manual assignments page. One of two things will happen:
1) The result is recorded, you get CPU credit, it doesn't count as a double-check even if it matches.
2) The server rejects the result as a duplicate.

Let us know what happens

[QUOTE=Prime95;273903]Feel free to use the manual assignments page. One of two things will happen:
1) The result is recorded, you get CPU credit, it doesn't count as a double-check even if it matches.
2) The server rejects the result as a duplicate.

Let us know what happens[/QUOTE]

In my case (triple check of a mismatched DC; first test w/ prime95, 2nd with cudalucas, 3rd with cudalucas), the result was 2 (no 385Ghz days for me :D ).

What happens if another user tries to submit?
 

[QUOTE=Prime95;273903]Feel free to use the manual assignments page. One of two things will happen:
1) The result is recorded, you get CPU credit, it doesn't count as a double-check even if it matches.
2) The server rejects the result as a duplicate.

Let us know what happens[/QUOTE]
[CODE]Processing result: M( 70000213 )C, 0xcf5b0f8d14e1____, n = 4194304, CUDALucas v1.2 Error code: 40, error text: This computer has already sent in this LL result for M70000213[/CODE]Ähm, I guess "this computer" refers to a single global "Manual testing" PC? This would mean that only 1 manual testing result is being accepted. What a pity for the second CUDALucas user on submit...
Otherwise, what happens if another user tries this?
By the way, no GHz days. ;-)