mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   Lounge (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Things that make you go "Hmmmm…" (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=1256)

ckdo 2011-06-19 18:31

[URL="http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/46305"]Hackers steal quantum code
[/URL]

retina 2011-06-20 15:36

The Basic Laws Of Human Stupidity
 
[url]http://wwwcsif.cs.ucdavis.edu/~leeey/stupidity/basic.htm[/url]

petrw1 2011-06-20 18:02

1 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE=retina;264224][url]http://wwwcsif.cs.ucdavis.edu/~leeey/stupidity/basic.htm[/url][/QUOTE]

Illustrated clearly here:

cheesehead 2011-06-22 20:12

We know art when we see it, from an early age
 
[url]http://bodyodd.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/06/21/6912018-tiny-art-critics-babies-pick-picasso-study-finds[/url]

[url]http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2011-11055-001/[/url]

Christenson 2011-06-22 23:00

[QUOTE=cheesehead;264442][url]http://bodyodd.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/06/21/6912018-tiny-art-critics-babies-pick-picasso-study-finds[/url]

[url]http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2011-11055-001/[/url][/QUOTE]

There's a different explanation, IMO: Picasso is different enough to be interesting, Monet is close to something that has been seen before...it will take awhile for impressionism to get interesting.

99.94 2011-06-23 09:20

[url]http://www.theage.com.au/technology/technology-news/secret-money-abc-virtual-currency-racket-probe-20110623-1ggp6.html[/url]

cheesehead 2011-06-23 21:50

[QUOTE=Christenson;264452]There's a different explanation, IMO: Picasso is different enough to be interesting, Monet is close to something that has been seen before...it will take awhile for impressionism to get interesting.[/QUOTE]How is your version significantly different from their "Results suggest that infants discriminate and categorize different paintings but that they display a spontaneous preference for paintings by Picasso"? Infants are known to discriminate on the basis of familiarity.

only_human 2011-06-23 22:17

[url]http://www.buzzfeed.com/fjelstud/the-100-longest-entries-on-wikipedia[/url]

Christenson 2011-06-24 00:39

[QUOTE=cheesehead;264524]How is your version significantly different from their "Results suggest that infants discriminate and categorize different paintings but that they display a spontaneous preference for paintings by Picasso"? Infants are known to discriminate on the basis of familiarity.[/QUOTE]
It's not...it's that I'm suggesting a more general underlying mechanism for the result, which the researchers (or maybe the reporters garbling the results) did not seem to do.

davieddy 2011-06-25 01:44

I think it is helpful to consider why adults appreciate both Monet
and Picasso, but for quite different reasons.
I'm sure the same sort of thing applies to music.

David

Flatlander 2011-06-25 14:02

[QUOTE=davieddy;264611]I think it is helpful to consider why adults appreciate both Monet
and Picasso, but for quite different reasons.
I'm sure the same sort of thing applies to music.

David[/QUOTE]

[URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ON-7v4qnHP8"]Loadsa Monet[/URL]
Sorry.

Did you see Fake or Fortune on iPlayer?


All times are UTC. The time now is 23:13.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.