You can take both :smile:

[QUOTE=debrouxl;299463]You can take both :smile:[/QUOTE]

Ok. Just update the missing files...lol

Started 683_73_minus1 on the laptop, LA less than 8 hours to go.
I can then take 3543791_31_minus1.
2069_67_minus1 is schedule to finish tomorrow morning, 2083_67_minus1 will be next.

Carlos

683_73_minus1 done, started 3543791_31_minus1.

2083_67_minus1 will be done tonight (~11 pm GMT).
Is 691_73_minus1 ready for post-processing?!

~41.5M raw relations received and an estimated ~7M raw relations remaining... it might be too early for 691_73_minus1 with 29-bit LPs.
But it might also work, as SNFS difficulty 207 tasks can also be sieved with 28-bit LPs tasks (that's what I usually did until the current series), which usually need ~30M raw relations.

[QUOTE=debrouxl;299627]~41.5M raw relations received and an estimated ~7M raw relations remaining... it might be too early for 691_73_minus1 with 29-bit LPs.
But it might also work, as SNFS difficulty 207 tasks can also be sieved with 28-bit LPs tasks (that's what I usually did until the current series), which usually need ~30M raw relations.[/QUOTE]

Tried one hour ago without success. What do you gain by sieving as a 29-bit LP task instead of 28-bit one? Now, you probably will need 55M raw relations to build a matrix against the ~30M raw relations as you mentioned by running as 28-bit LP task.

[QUOTE=jrk;299353]I would like to reserve 79_113_minus1.[/QUOTE]

Testing:

[code]

Thu May 17 00:16:35 2012 commencing linear algebra
Thu May 17 00:16:36 2012 read 3232983 cycles
Thu May 17 00:16:40 2012 cycles contain 7664723 unique relations
Thu May 17 00:18:51 2012 read 7664723 relations
Thu May 17 00:19:02 2012 using 20 quadratic characters above 536864240
Thu May 17 00:19:39 2012 building initial matrix
Thu May 17 00:21:16 2012 memory use: 1059.9 MB
Thu May 17 00:21:20 2012 read 3232983 cycles
Thu May 17 00:21:21 2012 matrix is 3232803 x 3232983 (954.4 MB) with weight 283292305 (87.63/col)
Thu May 17 00:21:21 2012 sparse part has weight 214614428 (66.38/col)
Thu May 17 00:21:48 2012 filtering completed in 2 passes
Thu May 17 00:21:49 2012 matrix is 3231391 x 3231571 (954.2 MB) with weight 283240981 (87.65/col)
Thu May 17 00:21:49 2012 sparse part has weight 214593868 (66.41/col)
Thu May 17 00:21:56 2012 matrix starts at (0, 0)
Thu May 17 00:21:57 2012 matrix is 3231391 x 3231571 (954.2 MB) with weight 283240981 (87.65/col)
Thu May 17 00:21:57 2012 sparse part has weight 214593868 (66.41/col)
Thu May 17 00:21:57 2012 saving the first 48 matrix rows for later
Thu May 17 00:21:58 2012 matrix includes 64 packed rows
Thu May 17 00:21:59 2012 matrix is 3231343 x 3231571 (902.8 MB) with weight 222557151 (68.87/col)
Thu May 17 00:21:59 2012 sparse part has weight 204360489 (63.24/col)
Thu May 17 00:21:59 2012 using block size 65536 for processor cache size 6144 kB
Thu May 17 00:22:11 2012 commencing Lanczos iteration (8 threads)
Thu May 17 00:22:11 2012 memory use: 898.4 MB
Thu May 17 00:22:28 2012 linear algebra at 0.0%, ETA 9h27m
Thu May 17 00:22:33 2012 checkpointing every 350000 dimensions
[/code]

I'm amazed by the fact that an Intel core i7 2630QM at 2.0 GHz with 8 threads clearly beats an Intel core i5 750@3.6 GHz with 4 cores and consumes a lot less when running msieve. I can't imagine how fast are the new IB processors. I think it's time to retire my core i5...:no:

691_73_minus1 is ready for post-processing. I won't run it but LA phase will take less than 24 hours.

Where are the .fb files?
 

I'll take 60001_223 as soon as a .fb file is posted.
It appears the latest numbers are missing the .fb file.