![]() |
[QUOTE=R.D. Silverman;347376]There are many such among the Homogeneous Cunninghams.[/QUOTE]
I've been eying these, but I'd like to see another 4k ecm curves at 43M first. Perhaps Paul has some GCW's that are ready. |
[QUOTE=XYYXF;347378]Then
C211_127_90 (127^15)^6 + 90*(90^21)^6 = 7*13*601*1455069078673406790157685576941687*C211 C244_129_82 276922881*(129^13)^6 + 551368*(82^21)^6 = 13*83*C244 Both ECMed up to 18k@110M.[/QUOTE] We'll take these. :smile: |
[QUOTE=frmky;347380]I've been eying these, but I'd like to see another 4k ecm curves at 43M first. Perhaps Paul has some GCW's that are ready.[/QUOTE]
I have run 800 curves with B1 = 200M. (I am still working on the last 45; I am out on disability leave to cope with my chemo. ) |
[QUOTE=frmky;347374]We have plenty of targets for 15e. We need well-ecm'ed numbers for 14e, SNFS 210-250 or GNFS 150-168.[/QUOTE]
Also as far as I can see you have rather few people running 15e; L1421 is picking up only 700MB of relations a day, whilst L3945A picked up 2.5GB/day at times. Is there a way to incite people to move from 14e to 15e? (or do you want people capable of running 15e mostly to be running 16e?) |
[QUOTE=frmky;347381]We'll take these. :smile:[/QUOTE]Thanks a lot :)
|
The c164 cofactor of (10^495-1)/9 maybe a candidate but i don“t know how much ecm is done.
And 10^229-1 is also a candidate its well ecm d |
10^229-1 has been fully factored years ago; typo?
|
yes sorry typo - meaning 10^229-9
[URL]http://homepage2.nifty.com/m_kamada/math/c/99991.htm#N229[/URL] |
And two pretty GNFS targets:
C168_127_110 [code]518759670509518390499884894142825232305789370205934770356684820953606669616234831388561087386018771667622991938328056602692240129084683654895676978808741395629768407883[/code] C168_130_119 [code]619210585289939300853894524032703690620745598172616026950373110134063171003372954902148138740033081843433800699129174962738134140333754085866583619110148324516327414223[/code] Both ECMed up to 7600@43M. |
[QUOTE=frmky;347374]We have plenty of targets for 15e. We need well-ecm'ed numbers for 14e, SNFS 210-250 or GNFS 150-168.[/QUOTE]
It looks like you are covered for now. If not, 8167^61-1 and 5981^61-1 have had ECM to 2/9 of size, mostly a combination of 43M and 110M curves. More available if needed. |
K?
[size=1] Fixed to M. Thanks[/size] |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 23:09. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.