results GC_6_306 & L1289
 

[B]L1289[/B]
[code]
prp72 factor: 668250198495427122412321130942954720966515331994938259840790649992524281
prp188 factor: 63814734860863545533258060959347736445158976592157810508172572949015478121752163493696405799837896667620683209827324094325864398744987173125148156062430686305231085444640527541329257082921
[/code]20.3M matrix with target_density=120

[B]GC_6_306[/B]
[code]
prp71 factor: 64268349655682230966931623435587158705631113047744016148277127480294107
prp134 factor: 17239789703613366626160055205714324638384800389328183883071910515488377388157145536002741609417837208665966966599827883190256000613367
[/code]7.1M matrix with target_density=130, was over-sieved pretty much.

[B]GC_6_307[/B] ETA
Linear algebra completed 2564620 of 12988748 dimensions (19.8%, ETA 80h23m)

logs attached.

lasieved and lasievee queue
 

Who collects the results for Lucus/Fibonacci numbers? I'd like to email them in case (s)he isn't following this thread.

BTW, the lasieve[B]E[/B] queue is almost empty. The last number in the queue (L1926) has already 59M relations of the ~250M NFS@home usually does for numbers that size. So I guestimate the buffer will be empty in about a week. Are there any candidates ready for NFS with appropriate (S/G)NFS difficulty???

Another heads-up:
GC_3_512 is queued [B]TWICE [/B]in the lasieved queue.
GC_7_282 still needs to be re-sieved with correct poly/ini

[QUOTE=VictordeHolland;388490]Who collects the results for Lucus/Fibonacci numbers? I'd like to email them in case (s)he isn't following this thread.
[/QUOTE]
[url]http://mersennus.net/fibonacci/[/url]

[QUOTE=VictordeHolland;388490]So I guestimate the buffer will be empty in about a week. Are there any candidates ready for NFS with appropriate (S/G)NFS difficulty???[/QUOTE]How big is that? I may be able to find one or two but most of the ECM effort so far has been dedicated to smaller numbers.

Paul

[QUOTE=xilman;388494]How big is that? I may be able to find one or two but most of the ECM effort so far has been dedicated to smaller numbers.

Paul[/QUOTE]
I don't know the precise requirements, but the last ones were in the range SNFS(260-270) and GNFS(169-179).

[QUOTE=VictordeHolland;388490]...So I guestimate the buffer will be empty in about a week. Are there any candidates ready for NFS with appropriate (S/G)NFS difficulty?[/QUOTE]
Cofactor of [URL="http://factordb.com/index.php?query=I%281345%29%2FI%28269%29%2F5"]F1345[/URL] could be a nice target.
The polynomial is a quartic which should be propped with uneven fb lims - the patterns for large quartics are easily found in older quartic projects. Then, maybe, F1405 and F1415 - using the same poly. All three have no known factors and are well-ECMd.


[COLOR=DarkGreen]EDIT: P.S. Because there was no interest, I'll run F1345 myself.[/COLOR]

[quote]GC_3_512 is queued [B]TWICE [/B]in the lasieved queue.[/QUOTE]
Yup, I had noticed your previous post and I sent an e-mail to Greg about that, indicating that I'd kill one of the two entries :smile:
But I haven't done so yet.

IIRC, I need to queue at least one non-GCW number: a Home Primes C158 for Dubslow.

[QUOTE=debrouxl;388547]IIRC, I need to queue at least one non-GCW number: a Home Primes C158 for [STRIKE]Dubslow[/STRIKE] [I]my favorite person wombatman[/I].[/QUOTE]

:tu:

(Probably. I know I had one.)

It sure aint me, guv.

L1291
 

Regarding L1291:
Matrix successfully built with target_density=116.
Started linear algebra 9 hours ago.
linear algebra completed 651226 of 21749514 dimensions (3.0%, ETA 256h52m)

Taking GC_8_264.