![]() |
Number 2 of 4
7,320+
[CODE] Sun Jan 17 03:47:44 2010 prp94 factor: 2012386525154439162516134173158312765782049743858497994307802458783963909258968948610325640321 Sun Jan 17 03:47:44 2010 prp107 factor: 76902829945433945749714743425367691074573593972093444306866835811065285139783450924641994715601966010900481[/CODE] Information 2 of 3: I will prove that I will be able to crack off 2,935- with my resources. [quote=S485122;202088]Raman, Andi was referring to this [/quote] I was only referring up to that, as well. [quote=S485122;202088] Looking at the address I would say it is someone whose mail is at the same server as you. In your place I would heed the suggestions of all those who warn you :anybody can see what you are doing by issuing the right command (ps-f if I remember well from my Unix SVr4 days...) Jacob[/quote] Actually, that it is not an e-mail at all. Rather it was a message that was being sent through computer accounts within Linux, personally. It is a Local Area Network address to be said better, specifically. Try out that address via e-mail, it won't work out at all. E-mails will bounce off when sent up to that address. My e-mail account at my department has a different domain name address, actually. Again, that message was more than 3 months old. Nobody has warned me up about that again, at all. If anyone warns me up again, then I will certainly take care of, about that incident, to be said out exactly. |
Number 3 of 4
1 Attachment(s)
2,1778L
[code]Sun Jan 17 15:07:51 2010 prp59 factor: 47053600640208033059241039730284317814777697416570061157789 Sun Jan 17 15:07:51 2010 prp154 factor: 3983899053669984841222674845155736648421760172156945433143597100265024374434790419503438904580763946655526357711331935392409311262424974379715413461877969[/code]Expecting to see the factors of 10,351+ on Wednesday or Thursday. (This is the number 4 of 4) Information 3 of 3 [quote=jasonp;200632] zipped log file [/quote] If you wanted the log files to be zipped up, then I would have attached up the entire log file, with relation errors, the log file of complete clique removal process, etc. Right then? :wink: On the night of 10 January 2010, I was supposed to write up that "Expecting the factors of 2,1778L 7,320+ 10,339+ 10,351+ tomorrow morning GMT 0330 (or IST 0900) if the linear algebra or the square root does not fail off at all". On the morning of 11 January 2010, I looked up that the square root process has failed out, fetching me up with a great disappointment! :shock: That's why I went violent all the subsequent days, at the communication processes... right then! |
Reserving 6,355-
I am willing to do all the quartics in order, especially those early holes first.
I will run 6,355- for sieving on the compute cluster tonight... |
How to add up some text under user name?
1) Expecting the factors of 10,351+ on Thursday.
2) 2,935- is 35% sieved. 3) I am updating the pages of the Cunningham Tables on the Mersenne Wiki regularly. 4) I see that some users have some text written under their user names. How is it possible to create one for me? For me, a good quote will be "Come on! Factor M1061" :wink: (Or if it is not that much polite at all) - "Come on! Can you factor M1061?" PS: Anyone who likes to have it up, can have one for them! :geek: |
[quote=Raman;202251]4) I see that some users have some text written under their user names. How is it
possible to create one for me? For me, a good quote will be "Come on! Factor M1061" :wink: (Or if it is not that much polite at all) - "Come on! Can you factor M1061?" PS: Anyone who likes to have it up, can have one for them! :geek:[/quote] Right now only the supermods can assign anybody that text. It's usually a humorous reference to some posts associated with the user. e.g. I pointed out how the Log Out button, which had text that popped up when you rolled over it (title text?) saying "Delete random account and then log out", was just joking and how it was probably the gerbils (or their ghosts), and a short time later, "Account Deleted" appeared under my name. You can request it to be something you want, but I won't guarantee that they'll actually make it that! |
[quote=Mini-Geek;202254]You can request it to be something you want, but I won't guarantee that they'll actually make it that![/quote]
In fact you could almost guarantee it wont be what you ask for. |
[quote=henryzz;202284]In fact you could almost guarantee it wont be what you ask for.[/quote]
What did you ask up for? And then what is the meaning of the word 'gerbils'? I have been seeing the word for quite a long time, but I am wondering about, without understanding its meaning at all... |
A list of all of the "forum assistants" (gerbils, etc...I think it's really a list of Xyzzy's pets, except the trolls):
[URL]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=10536[/URL] The gerbils dying: [URL]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=9544[/URL] Regarding "Just call me Henry": Around [URL]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?p=199366#post199366[/URL] |
henryzz:
It seems that you could have asked up the gerbils for the text under the user name as "Just call me Henry" then he would have given you up with some other blurb, like such as "Just call me David" :w00t: Just call me up simply only as what? By the way, here are the factors of your C86 candidate only: that you mentioned up already before itself! Long long ago only, right now, by now itself [code]Fri Jan 22 23:01:36 2010 prp35 factor: 93332947856095712546810785570424323 Fri Jan 22 23:01:37 2010 prp51 factor: 521239830334269776198625198484462725859316968913831 Fri Jan 22 23:01:37 2010 elapsed time 00:45:50 [/code] |
1) Does running the Linear Algebra on multiple cores not speed it up much?
Because it would have taken 6 days for 2,1778L on two cores, but on a compute cluster with 8 cores, it has taken upto 4.5 days. I am going to run the future matrices only on 4 cores of the compute cluster, the rest I will allocate for sieving. 2) 2,935- crashed up at special q value of 147895277 It says that "Special q 147895277 does not divide, Aborted" What does it mean? By the way, here is the polynomial file... I am supposing to sieve the special q ranges from 50 million to 150 million exactly. [CODE]n: 1274100224661006750837307548598427253036961482747305616223631289453325965689332056907927504879940928269631872162135333180651879126786423739992341541069280105926107714645793292038681 m: 196159429230833773869868419475239575503198607639501078528 c4: 1 c3: 1 c2: 1 c1: 1 c0: 1 skew: 1 type: snfs rlim: 150000000 alim: 25000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 29 mfbr: 62 mfba: 58 rlambda: 2.6 alambda: 2.6 [/CODE] |
[QUOTE=Raman;204392]1) Does running the Linear Algebra on multiple cores not speed it up much?
Because it would have taken 6 days for 2,1778L on two cores, but on a compute cluster with 8 cores, it has taken upto 4.5 days. I am going to run the future matrices only on 4 cores of the compute cluster, the rest I will allocate for sieving. [/QUOTE] The LA runtime depends on how fast the memory and memory controller of the machine is; older machines should not run more than perhaps two threads per physical CPU, but the newer Core i7 systems have a much better memory controller that allows ~4 threads per CPU to still show a speedup. |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 21:49. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.