reserving 270-275 for another computer

Taking 275k-280k



265k-270k complete

Lennart

lennart,i didnt think you reserved 265-275, a typo?

nevermind,looking at your results,it looks to be a typo

[quote=Dougal;187369]lennart,i didnt think you reserved 265-275, a typo?

nevermind,looking at your results,it looks to be a typo[/quote]

Yes sorry. Wrong by me :smile:

shall be 265k-270k


========================================================

I have sieved 290k-1M to 17T now.

978 sec/factor on one core 2,4Ghz

Here it is.





Lennart

[quote=Lennart;187373]Yes sorry. Wrong by me :smile:

shall be 265k-270k


========================================================

I have sieved 290k-1M to 17T now.

978 sec/factor on one core 2,4Ghz

Here it is.





Lennart[/quote]
I've fixed the typo in your original post. Meanwhile, are you planning to continue with the sieve, or are you stopping at 17T? On my computer (C2D 2.2Ghz), tests at ~260K take about 990 seconds apiece. Thus, it would seem that we're still a ways away from optimal for anything >290K.

[quote=mdettweiler;187379]I've fixed the typo in your original post. Meanwhile, are you planning to continue with the sieve, or are you stopping at 17T? On my computer (C2D 2.2Ghz), tests at ~260K take about 990 seconds apiece. Thus, it would seem that we're still a ways away from optimal for anything >290K.[/quote]

Thank's.


Yes it is true that we have to sieve more.

I will countinue to sieve, i just thought we need more to LLR soon :smile:


Lennart

195-200 is complete.

[quote=Lennart;187380]Thank's.


Yes it is true that we have to sieve more.

I will countinue to sieve, i just thought we need more to LLR soon :smile:


Lennart[/quote]
Ah, I see. Well, I was thinking that we should probably wait until the next chunk (290K-400K?) is optimally sieved before breaking off any more for LLRing. If we end up running out of files for a short time, there's always plenty of work over on the Sierpinski side. Of course, the final decision is up to Gary. :smile:

Taking 280-285.

Thought I should give an update on 170k-175k:
I bit off a bit more than I could chew between NPLB, CRUS, and factoring, so I paused this work (after crunching ~45 of the ~280 candidates) until I could finish the NPLB work (specifically, mini-drive 454K-456K; that work is currently getting all of my CPU). That should finish early tomorrow morning, then within another two days or so I'll finish 170k-175k.
Sorry for the delay. Hopefully it's not causing too much trouble. (would be quite a mixed bag if a prime is in 170-175, huh! :smile: on the plus side, we'd be down to 7 k's, on the down side, that means I made other people waste work from doing needless tests on higher n's for the k) I'll be more careful in the future.

[quote=mdettweiler;187383]Ah, I see. Well, I was thinking that we should probably wait until the next chunk (290K-400K?) is optimally sieved before breaking off any more for LLRing. If we end up running out of files for a short time, there's always plenty of work over on the Sierpinski side. Of course, the final decision is up to Gary. :smile:[/quote]

I will have the file sieved to 32T tomorrow :smile:

275k-280k Complete.


Lennart