![]() |
I think it's gonna be a long, long time
[FONT=Trebuchet MS]Hey guys,
[/FONT]It's my first time on the forum, and i'm glad to be part of GIMPS :smile: I've been going for about 2 weeks and I used to a few years back aswell. I've very recently (about 5 minutes ago) got a Pentium III @ 500MHz doing LL (100) "first-time" tests, and although already having a vague knowledge of how incredibly long it takes to do them, I was shocked to be told that it would take 626 days! :rofl: I don't know whether it's worth the time and effort to let it carry on working, since it said that the exponent might be re-assigned after a year anyway. Any advice? Cheers :smile: |
My advice is to change the work type for that machine to TF-LMH.
Trial Factoring assignments are much shorter in duration. And those in the higher ranges (commonly known as LMH) are even faster and more well suited to your machine. |
[quote=panic;179897]I was shocked to be told that it would take 626 days! :rofl:
I don't know whether it's worth the time and effort to let it carry on working, since it said that the exponent might be re-assigned after a year anyway. Any advice?[/quote]Be sure to send in regular progress reports. Exponents likely to be reassigned are those showing no recent progress. |
[QUOTE=cheesehead;179908]Be sure to send in regular progress reports. Exponents likely to be reassigned are those showing no recent progress.[/QUOTE]And perform a back-up of the directory about once a month.
Also, a double check would be faster, as it is a smaller number. |
[quote=Uncwilly;179907]My advice is to change the work type for that machine to TF-LMH.
Trial Factoring assignments are much shorter in duration. And those in the higher ranges (commonly known as LMH) are even faster and more well suited to your machine.[/quote] [FONT=Trebuchet MS]Ah yeah thanks, i'm not prepared to wait nearly 2 years for a result! :smile: A lot of Elton John to listen to if I let it carry on! :rofl: Cheers [/FONT] |
old PIII
Hi. May be a good idea to change to Linux, use mprime instead of prime95 in order to optimize cpu resources, and if you have enough memory you could try doing p-1.
Regards, Carlos |
[quote=pegaso56;179933]Hi. May be a good idea to change to Linux, use mprime instead of prime95 in order to optimize cpu resources, and if you have enough memory you could try doing p-1.
Regards, Carlos[/quote] Coincidentally I already was using linux 32-bit mprime with nothing else running :smile: I've now assigned P-1 factoring. Cheers |
I forget how much power those P3s use, but purely from an electrical cost perspective you might do pretty well with the P3. There was someone a good while back who put a bunch of P3 stuff together, about a kilowatt of power draw, I think. That person did really well from a total cost perspective and it might still be true for P3s.
You can do whatever you want, I'm just killing time with this post. :) |
[quote=jasong;179991]I forget how much power those P3s use, but purely from an electrical cost perspective you might do pretty well with the P3. There was someone a good while back who put a bunch of P3 stuff together, about a kilowatt of power draw, I think. That person did really well from a total cost perspective and it might still be true for P3s.
You can do whatever you want, I'm just killing time with this post. :)[/quote] i would be surprised if a kilowatt-worth of p3s would outdo one cheap Q6600 plus a Q6600 would use maybe a quarter of the power and possibly cost less than getting a lot of p3 parts together |
A kilowatt worth of P3's is very interesting
[QUOTE=jasong;179991]I forget how much power those P3s use, but purely from an electrical cost perspective you might do pretty well with the P3. There was someone a good while back who put a bunch of P3 stuff together, about a kilowatt of power draw, I think. That person did really well from a total cost perspective and it might still be true for P3s.
You can do whatever you want, I'm just killing time with this post. :)[/QUOTE] Combined with another suggestion I read earlier today, booting Linux without a hard drive using NFS and PXE, I can believe somebody got enough P3 processors to do more with a kilowatt than with one bleeding-edge standalone system that also requires one kilowatt. If you can find that story about the P3s I'd read it. Reed Young |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 19:18. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.