![]() |
[QUOTE=davieddy;271371]@ Paul
Are you starting to doubt your doubt re my doubt yet?[/QUOTE]Not in the slightest. I stand by my statement about the compatibility of the posts which report historical records and expected future behaviour under a particular statistical model. Paul |
Irony weapons
[QUOTE=xilman;271444]Not in the slightest. I stand by my statement about the compatibility of the posts which report historical records and expected future behaviour under a particular statistical model.
Paul[/QUOTE] We two (and William etc) know whether we are taking the P or being serious (usually simultaneously). Amusing as many of UncWilly's posts are, I'm not sure that he (or even Crandall) quite appreciates the irrelevance of historical data when it comes to "Predicting M48". (note the rare "staying on topic" bit) BTW how is 10metreh doing these days? David |
[QUOTE=davieddy;271448]the irrelevance of historical data when it
comes to "Predicting M48".[/QUOTE]Exactly. That's why I stand by my evaluation of the situation. Uncwilly's and your statements are compatible because they are conveying truths about two essentially uncorrelated phenomena. Paul |
Doornob's broken...
[QUOTE=xilman;271450]Exactly. That's why I stand by my evaluation of the situation. Uncwilly's and your statements are compatible because they are conveying truths about two essentially uncorrelated phenomena.
Paul[/QUOTE] Don't send me more letters please [URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ah9dO4Ebfck"]Desolation Row[/URL] excepted:smile: David |
1 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE=davieddy;271448]Amusing as many of UncWilly's posts are, I'm not sure that he (or even Crandall) quite appreciates the irrelevance of historical data when it comes to "Predicting M48".[/QUOTE]Hadn't you noticed that this thread is in the lounge and not in Math or Data?
Didn't you consider that this thread is: [attach]6989[/attach] |
[QUOTE=Uncwilly;271502]Hadn't you noticed that this thread is in the lounge and not in Math or Data?
Didn't you consider that this thread is: [attach]6989[/attach][/QUOTE] Infamy, Infamy... I don't think many here would consider a lack of frivolity to be one of my chief faults. Besides, I find math fun, and certainly discuss it frequently over coffee or something stronger. David |
1 Attachment(s)
[URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jdIESQOrhQ&feature=related"]the_mi|k's[/URL]
° : 3 5 |
[QUOTE=davieddy;271616]Infamy, Infamy...
David[/QUOTE] I assume that's the Carry On (?) line. Always makes me giggle. |
[QUOTE=Flatlander;271731]I assume that's the Carry On (?) line. Always makes me giggle.[/QUOTE]
Nah. We haven't heard of Frankie Howard this side of the pond since Roman Times. PS If Paul wishes to argue the toss, I will [B]stand [/B]corrected. Sid James PPS I wouldn't put that line past Kenneth Williams. |
T'was Kenneth Williams. "Infamy! Infamy! They've allllll got it infamy!"
|
[QUOTE=Flatlander;271740]T'was Kenneth Williams. "Infamy! Infamy! They've allllll got it infamy!"[/QUOTE]
Well at least I covered all bases. Meantime, if you ever wondered why Billie Holiday and Lester young got together [url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTruL8h83RM]Listen to this[/url] David |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 22:37. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.