[QUOTE=ewmayer;176595]Thanks, Rob, for tracking down the Big Iron hardware for the parallel verify run.[/QUOTE]

[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6UeRthTT4g[/url]

[QUOTE=Primeinator;176596]Awesome. What is your user ID for Primenet? Just Kevin?[/QUOTE]

kmd

Many thanks! I become a little anxious when a potential new prime has been found (if you couldn't tell).

38 % done already
 

[QUOTE]Interim file at iteration 15000000. Res64: E434D21E038D3FEA.

[Jun 08 22:58:31] Iter. 16240000 ( 38.08%) (0.0174 sec/iter). France Time
USA CentralTime = 15:58pm[/QUOTE]

"Jusqu'ici tout va bien..."

[QUOTE=ewmayer;176595]Yes, but not around *here* [/QUOTE]Hello Ernst !
Seems that Guillermo did a very good work with Glucas !
Sure that Mlucas will be much better ! very soon !
And I still don't understand how one can compute a square of an integer with floating numbers... Damned FFT.
R.

[CODE]Iteration 15000000 / 42643801
M42643801 interim Wd8 residue 09D824C3A31907F8 at iteration 15000000
M42643801 interim Wd8 residue 91F1F24D25593670 at iteration 15000001
M42643801 interim Wd8 residue F13E5F2F9B40A213 at iteration 15000002[/CODE]

:huh:

[QUOTE]
Code:

Iteration 15000000 / 42643801
M42643801 interim Wd8 residue 09D824C3A31907F8 at iteration 15000000
M42643801 interim Wd8 residue 91F1F24D25593670 at iteration 15000001
M42643801 interim Wd8 residue F13E5F2F9B40A213 at iteration 15000002

[/QUOTE]

I think they said earlier that 42643801 was not the exponent but was put there later to trick everyone else that had not gotten the original one...

[QUOTE=Primeinator;176608]I think they said earlier that 42643801 was not the exponent but was put there later to trick everyone else that had not gotten the original one...[/QUOTE]

Or is that just what they [I]want[/I] you to think?

[QUOTE=Kevin;176610]Or is that just what they [I]want[/I] you to think?[/QUOTE]
Or perhaps the above is what we want you to think that we want you to think. :recurse:

I think that these Prime95/mprime interim residues are not the same as the residues returned by both Glucas and Mlucas. Either that, or both Kevin and ATH are having hardware problems. It would be interesting to compare their residues.

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;175993]Just for drill I have started a fresh factoring run on the number from the bottom up to an absurdly high level. Can a P-1 monster machine be thrown at it too? If they do hide the expo, and you are a known forum goodbody, I can PM it to you.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=unconnected;176077]I'll run P-1 test. BTW, what is the secret atmosphere about that exponent? Anybody can find it, knowing userID from first post.[/QUOTE]
Unnconnected, thanks for being a putz. I said I would handle the TF, you said that you would P-1. How come then, you are reporting TF's?

Please state your intent on how far you are going to take the expo. There is no reason to step on toes. If I knew that you were going to TF (with a faster machine), I could have started on a higher bit level or have gone back to my normal work. I am half way through the bit level that you posted results for.

I would point out that you only have 9 posts to the forum. Not exactly a known person around here.

[QUOTE=philmoore;176618]I think that these Prime95/mprime interim residues are not the same as the residues returned by both Glucas and Mlucas. Either that, or both Kevin and ATH are having hardware problems. It would be interesting to compare their residues.[/QUOTE]

No reported hardware errors. What I think is interesting is that ATH's residues were Wd2, mine were Wd8, and when I enable the option on my laptop it says Wd1. I couldn't find any documentation on what that's supposed to mean.