[QUOTE=Sergiosi;366818][URL="http://factordb.com/aliquot.php?type=1&aq=228522&big=1"]228522[/URL] terminates :smile:[/QUOTE]
Nice run, congratulations!

[QUOTE=Sergiosi;366818][URL="http://factordb.com/aliquot.php?type=1&aq=228522&big=1"]228522[/URL] terminates :smile:[/QUOTE]
My congratulatios for this work
Wolfgang

[URL="http://factordb.com/aliquot.php?type=1&aq=629718&big=1"]629718[/URL] terminates.

I've recently noticed that [URL="http://factordb.com/aliquot.php?type=1&aq=927468&big=1"]927468[/URL] terminates. I don't know who did it (f1pokerspeed?).

[QUOTE=unconnected;375180]I've recently noticed that [URL="http://factordb.com/aliquot.php?type=1&aq=927468&big=1"]927468[/URL] terminates. I don't know who did it (f1pokerspeed?).[/QUOTE]
He has it reserved so that's the standard assumption unless he claims otherwise.

With gaining Dubslow's site back are we aware of any new merges or are there any merges that haven't made it into the first post here?

Before I cleaned everything up, my merge finder had been reporting the following merges:
[code]273540 seems to have merged with 3876
927468 seems to have merged with 856710
467658 seems to have merged with 247296
981924 seems to have merged with 768612
346848 seems to have merged with 8844
856710 seems to have merged with 629718
209376 seems to have merged with 80880
448476 seems to have merged with 1074[/code]
These have been slowly accumulating since I went afk; the 8th merge occurred sometime in July, and around new years 5 of these had already occurred. I have no idea which may have been reported. What is certain is that I have [STRIKE]9200[/STRIKE] 9201 sequences.

467658 is the only sequence you mentioned that isn't in the first post. It is an odd one as it now only has 10 iterations. Usually a sequence doesn't come down to then merge with another sequence like this. Apart from the fact we name a sequence based on its smallest iteration I would say that 247296 merged with 467658.

467658:i10 = 247296:i3037 = 410529720

I feel like I should put this in the first post but putting it as a 10 iteration long sequence which reached 9 digits seems ridiculous.

[QUOTE=henryzz;383351]I feel like I should put this in the first post but putting it as a 10 iteration long sequence which reached 9 digits seems ridiculous.[/QUOTE]
It goes to the second post. There are a few like this one in it.

[QUOTE=Batalov;383354]It goes to the second post. There are a few like this one in it.[/QUOTE]
Good point I will add it along with another comment.

[URL="http://factordb.com/sequences.php?se=1&aq=660212&action=last20&fr=0&to=100"]660212[/URL] terminates at i2793 = 73.