[QUOTE=LaurV;290439]Side question: are you (schickel) double-checking the elf files before erasing them from the copybook? Since the stories with scrambled sequences on the DB my back sweats every time I hear a sequence terminates :P[/QUOTE]No, I haven't been checking. To tell the truth, I had not even thought about doing it, but now that it's been brought up, I'll have to go back and check the last dozen or so terminations to verify everything.

There are, I hope, two possible things helping out here: other than bchaffin's workers, I assume everyone works on their sequences locally, so only results are uploaded to the DB, while the local files would remain true and correct. Secondly, I have been sending Wolfgang details and sequence files for the terminations and merges and I assume he's been checking them on his end. At least I have not recieved any word from him about problems with any of the sequences.....

91008 terminates at term 2845, from a max height of 112 digits. (Or merges with 71264, depending on how you want to count it.)

I think that's my first termination under 100k. Woot!

[QUOTE=bchaffin;292030]91008 terminates at term 2845, from a max height of 112 digits. (Or merges with 71264, depending on how you want to count it.)

I think that's my first termination under 100k. Woot![/QUOTE]Since it goes down low, then back up for a bit, I am inclined to call it a merge, but Wolfgang lists this as a straight termination.....

[QUOTE=schickel;292083]Since it goes down low, then back up for a bit, I am inclined to call it a merge, but Wolfgang lists this as a straight termination.....[/QUOTE]
Are we not considering the lowest term within a family as the one that terminates, with all other branches merging? If so, we should label it in line with our definition, unless there is a more "official" one that conflicts, in which case we should change all our lists...

940470 terminates.

[QUOTE=unconnected;292618]940470 terminates.[/QUOTE]
Nice fall! Congrats, and kotgw!

133938 terminates! Nice [URL="http://factordb.com/aliquot.php?type=1&aq=133938&big=1"]graph[/URL] btw.

[QUOTE=unconnected;294474]133938 terminates! Nice [URL="http://factordb.com/aliquot.php?type=1&aq=133938&big=1"]graph[/URL] btw.[/QUOTE][COLOR="Red"](Moved from the 2^2 * 3 project thread....)[/COLOR]

Unconnected strikes again! (I'm doing a full verification run since we are having issues with the DB.)

[EDIT: Looks good! Congrats!]

[QUOTE=unconnected;294474]133938 terminates! Nice [URL="http://factordb.com/aliquot.php?type=1&aq=133938&big=1"]graph[/URL] btw.[/QUOTE]
Congratulations from Aachen
Wolfgang

920478 terminates
 

[URL="http://factordb.com/aliquot.php?type=1&aq=920478"]920478[/URL] merges to 192556* and terminates with it.

Cannot see the plot (because "You have reached your hourly limit of 3000 IDs created") but it must be quite nice with two 120-ish humps.

[SIZE=1]*or some other[/SIZE]

P.S. [URL="http://factordb.com/aliquot.php?type=1&aq=920478"]920478[/URL] merges with [URL="http://factordb.com/aliquot.php?type=1&aq=163716"]163716[/URL], actually:
920478 :i3165 = 163716 :i6 = 3709636

Nice historical bridge into the second of this forum's terminations!