Yes, and more will be coming soon. For my older sequences, I am waiting for c125's. For "hit-and-run", only c120...

Here's a nice turn, though:
[URL="http://factorization.ath.cx/search.php?query=&se=1&aq=181650"]181650[/URL] -> 2[SUP]2[/SUP] . 3[SUP]2[/SUP] . 5[SUP]2[/SUP] . p . q :smile:

[QUOTE=Batalov;174258]Yes, and more will be coming soon. For my older sequences, I am waiting for c125's. For "hit-and-run", only c120...[/QUOTE]OK, maybe we should collect these in another thread if you plan on a bunch of them.[QUOTE]Here's a nice turn, though:
[URL="http://factorization.ath.cx/search.php?query=&se=1&aq=181650"]181650[/URL] -> 2[SUP]2[/SUP] . 3[SUP]2[/SUP] . 5[SUP]2[/SUP] . p . q :smile:[/QUOTE]:fingers crossed: <-- We need another smilie....:grin:

I'll keep my fingers crossed. It'd be nice to have some more of these high-level driver escapes.

[QUOTE=Batalov;174258]Here's a nice turn, though:
[URL="http://factorization.ath.cx/search.php?query=&se=1&aq=181650"]181650[/URL] -> 2[SUP]2[/SUP] . 3[SUP]2[/SUP] . 5[SUP]2[/SUP] . p . q :smile:[/QUOTE]

Nice or nasty? You got a non-trivial chance of jumping right into the 2^3*3 driver!

We-e-e-ell, that's for sure; that chance always with us. If not this iteration, then next. But still, if [I]p[/I] and [I]q[/I] are of a certain kind, then 3 might go away, and/or 5...
...hopefully both!
gnfs-122 will take a day though, but it is still better than a sharp stick in the eye.

[QUOTE=axn;174266]Nice or nasty? You got a non-trivial chance of jumping right into the 2^3*3 driver![/QUOTE]Well, just from a computational perspective, 2^3 * 3 is much nicer than 2^3 * 3 * 5, just in terms of the growth rate of the former versus the latter. I've also managed several escapes from 2^3 * 3 at high levels. 2^3 * 3 * 5 just grows so fast, there's no time....

[Edit:] batalov was here first! :razz:

199152 has get the downdriver at 141 digits!!. :party:
[URL="http://factorization.ath.cx/search.php?query=&se=1&aq=199152&action=last&fr=&to="]199152[/URL]: line 4651, size 139, 2*, C92 :maybeso:
[URL="http://factorization.ath.cx/search.php?query=&se=1&aq=153516&action=last&fr=&to="]153516[/URL]: line 1322, size 109, 2^3, C98
[URL="http://factorization.ath.cx/search.php?query=&se=1&aq=113250&action=last&fr=&to="]113250[/URL]: line 852, size 130, 2*3*5, C129

[quote=mataje;174352]199152 has get the downdriver at 141 digits!!. :party:
[URL="http://factorization.ath.cx/search.php?query=&se=1&aq=199152&action=last&fr=&to="]199152[/URL]: line 4651, size 139, 2*, C92 :maybeso:
[URL="http://factorization.ath.cx/search.php?query=&se=1&aq=153516&action=last&fr=&to="]153516[/URL]: line 1322, size 109, 2^3, C98
[URL="http://factorization.ath.cx/search.php?query=&se=1&aq=113250&action=last&fr=&to="]113250[/URL]: line 852, size 130, 2*3*5, C129[/quote]

Another new record! (130396 is under threat in the no5 spot for sequence length now!) :party:

My second downdriver running:
[URL="http://factorization.ath.cx/search.php?query=&se=1&aq=153516&action=last&fr=&to="]153516[/URL]: line 1345, size 108, 2*, C97 :smile:

[QUOTE=mataje;174402]My second downdriver running:
[URL="http://factorization.ath.cx/search.php?query=&se=1&aq=153516&action=last&fr=&to="]153516[/URL]: line 1345, size 108, 2*, C97 :smile:[/QUOTE]Look out, Batalov! :anurag:

[URL="http://factorization.ath.cx/search.php?query=&se=1&aq=147192"]147192[/URL]
I'm too busy looking at mine. :rolleyes:

[quote=Batalov;174420][URL="http://factorization.ath.cx/search.php?query=&se=1&aq=147192"]147192[/URL]
I'm too busy looking at mine. :rolleyes:[/quote]

Hmmm, that 5th place on the sequence length leaderboard for the 100-200k range looks really under threat now... :rolleyes: