[QUOTE=Batalov;221082]2529... 2530... ... 2535... nice!

How long a c113 will take these days? 15 minutes? :rolleyes:[/QUOTE]

add a few minutes for ECM pretesting and poly search.

No more C169's, please
 

Here's to an long sequence of 4I1[B]4[/B]e jobs for the remainder of this sequence.

Anything above C165 is not likely now - I was surprised we pulled that C171 and C169 in such quick succession.

[QUOTE=Batalov;221082]15 minutes? :rolleyes:[/QUOTE]
A bit longer than that. :smile:

[QUOTE=firejuggler;221086]do I see right? is it going down?[/QUOTE]Yes, as long as, :fingers crossed:, we can avoid any small primes in the factorizations, it will have a tendency to drop, albeit very much slower than with the downdriver.....

approx. 210 curves with B1=11e6 so far on the c156, no factor

Sequence 314718 is at index 8998...

[quote=10metreh;221168]Sequence 314718 is at index 8998...[/quote]
No one seems to have it reserved. Is it moving forward? There surely is only a very limited number of people who have the resources to move it on.

[QUOTE=henryzz;221169]No one seems to have it reserved. Is it moving forward? There surely is only a very limited number of people who have the resources to move it on.[/QUOTE]

314718 merged with 4788, so in computing 4788 we are also computing 314718. Were you confusing it with 552150 perhaps?

the problem is that it's summer and I don't believe in air-conditioning; temperature in my study was 42C this afternoon and the nfs-server disc array sounded a little siren and stopped serving transactions.

otherwise I could do the c156 by about Wednesday-week; I'm sure there are other people out there with similar resources ...

[QUOTE=fivemack;221189]otherwise I could do the c156 by about Wednesday-week; I'm sure there are other people out there with similar resources ...[/QUOTE]
ecm took care of it much more quickly

Sequence 314718 has passed line 9000! :bounce wave: