![]() |
1400@43e6, no factor
|
+1500@11e6
|
752@11e6, no factor.
|
600 more @ 43e6, no factor.
Probably another 14000@43e6 would be nice, to get to 2*t50; will run a load over the weekend. |
p-1: B1=1e10, B2=584e13, no factor
|
I'll reserve -np 120060,144000 for msieve poly search.
|
[QUOTE=fivemack;211751]600 more @ 43e6, no factor.
Probably another 14000@43e6 would be nice, to get to 2*t50; will run a load over the weekend.[/QUOTE] I've run 4750 curves on the cluster at B1=11e7 thus far, which amounts to about 1.5*t50 or 0.26*t55. I plan to run about 18000 curves at 11e7, which is about 1*t55. |
Please find a factor - too soon to sieve again
I pray for an ECM factor on this one.
It's too soon to have to do sieve C169, just days after a C171. A C165 I can live with. A C169 is just wrong. It could be worse, but this coincidence of fat composites is an irksome mockery. |
Summary of ECM so far (from this thread and factordb, percentages to 2dp):
1200@1e6 = 0.09% of t50, 0.01% of t55 2281@3e6 = 1.14% of t50, 0.10% of t55 4752@11e6 = 14.12% of t50, 1.67% of t55 2000@43e6 = 26.48% of t50, 4.02% of t55 4750@11e7 = 151.61% of t50, 26.73% of t55 Total: 193.45% of t50, 32.53% of t55 P-1: B1=1e10, B2=584e13 P+1: 3 x B1=5e8, B2≈151e10 |
[QUOTE=frmky;211829]I plan to run about 18000 curves at 11e7, which is about 1*t55.[/QUOTE]
I'm halfway there now. 9000 curves are done. |
435@110e6, no factor.
|
| All times are UTC. The time now is 23:11. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.