mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   Aliquot Sequences (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=90)
-   -   Reserved for MF - Sequence 4788 (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=11615)

frmky 2010-02-22 05:42

I've run 9400 curves at B1=11e7 so far.

Batalov 2010-02-22 05:58

That [I]is[/I] a lot, about ~t51 already.
So it's not too early.

[strike]I'll take msieve -np 24001,30000 chunk. No, probably won't have time.[/strike]
A 2.1e-13 poly would be nice.
(For another c171, I have a 1.7e-13 poly from 1-48000 and not satisfied.)

frmky 2010-02-22 06:08

[QUOTE=jrk;206299]
I will reserve -np 120060,144000[/QUOTE]
I've started 1 to 120000 on 4 GPUs.

Andi47 2010-02-22 06:15

[QUOTE=Batalov;206316]That [I]is[/I] a lot, about ~t51 already.
So it's not too early.
[/QUOTE]

Is my guess about right, that we need approx. t55 or t56?

Batalov 2010-02-22 06:38

It's 125 CPU* days to do a t55.
And 750 CPU days to do gnfs.
It all depends on how much one believes in luck, available resources etc...
If the ECM CPU time was free (PS3), why not even run a t60 I'd say.
____
*some CPU

jrk 2010-02-22 06:47

[QUOTE=Batalov;206316]A 2.1e-13 poly would be nice.[/QUOTE]
Or would it?

[code]
$ grep norm msieve.dat.p |sort -g -k7 -r|head
# norm 1.035357e-16 alpha -6.929733 e 2.847e-13
# norm 9.877354e-17 alpha -6.825118 e 2.760e-13
# norm 9.784672e-17 alpha -6.845675 e 2.750e-13
# norm 9.654567e-17 alpha -6.966033 e 2.721e-13
# norm 9.629041e-17 alpha -6.892626 e 2.719e-13
# norm 9.545591e-17 alpha -8.033764 e 2.686e-13
# norm 9.254898e-17 alpha -6.656010 e 2.655e-13
# norm 9.102714e-17 alpha -6.975543 e 2.621e-13
# norm 9.166923e-17 alpha -8.127207 e 2.615e-13
# norm 9.038645e-17 alpha -6.796628 e 2.607e-13
[/code]

Batalov 2010-02-22 07:01

Nice flare. I guess you can safely call me a man of low standards. :smile:

schickel 2010-02-22 08:36

[QUOTE=jrk;206299]Is it too early to start organizing a GPU poly search for the c171?[/QUOTE]What's it going to take to do the post-processing?

Batalov 2010-02-22 09:08

It may fit in 4Gb memory, barely, if oversieving is right. (a gnfs-174 needed about 5Gb.)
6Gb+ will be a safer bet. In any case, a 64-bit OS.
10-12M to a side matrix and 10 days BL, probably less on an i7.
Note: during BL the computer will be challenging for daily use.
Low standards will help to cope.

schickel 2010-02-22 09:39

1 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE=Batalov;206333]It may fit in 4Gb memory, barely, if oversieving is right. (a gnfs-174 needed about 5Gb.)
6Gb+ will be a safer bet. In any case, a 64-bit OS.
10-12M to a side matrix and 10 days BL, probably less on an i7.
Note: during BL the computer will be challenging for daily use.
Low standards will help to cope.[/QUOTE]Well, seeing as how I don't have an i7, I will offer my system up only if no one else steps forward with something more capable.....

As long as I can step the priority down on msieve, it should be fine, I don't play many of the latest FPS games.

[SIZE="1"]PS. Ignore the low WEI, that's because I'm running the stock MB graphics, not a super high octane, cutting edge GPU...[/SIZE]

fivemack 2010-02-22 10:33

2000@11e7 produced no factor, unsurprisingly.

I have computation coming out of my ears, but since my Internet download speed has dropped to 40kbytes/second it would probably take me as long to download the relations as to run the matrix :(


All times are UTC. The time now is 23:11.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.