[QUOTE=fivemack;201041]I think it might now be sensible for jrk to start a polynomial search.[/QUOTE]
Ok.

1000@11e6
+ 1@43e6 (benchmarking)

summing up to:

[CODE]
900 @ 1e6
3300 @ 11e6
2001 @ 40e6
1601 @ 43e6
1 @ 1e8[/CODE]

Edit: This is equal to ~344.5% of t45 = 55.3% of t50 = 8.01% of t55

p+1: 3* B1=3e9, B2=1e15, no factor.

[quote=unconnected;200835]After ~300 curves I got p45 factor.
[code]Factor=515906718700780232747489355180421058695246643 Method=ECM B1=11000000 Sigma=3903608469
[/code][/quote]

I have sent up that factor to Mr. Paul Zimmermann. He asks you to give your real name
in order to give the top 10 place for GMP-ECM factors within the year 2010 only.

[color=blue][b]10metreh:[/b] unconnected is Dmitry Domanov.[/color]

[QUOTE=bsquared;201046] 800 @ 11e7 scheduled for tonight[/QUOTE]

800 @ 11e7 done.

45@11e7 done.

Total curves done:

[code] 900 @ 1e6
3300 @ 11e6
2001 @ 40e6
1601 @ 43e6
1 @ 1e8
845 @ 11e7[/code]

this is equal to ~482.3% of t45 = 82.3% of t50 = 12.76% of t55 = 1.83% of t60

Arrgh, if I'd have posted a few minutes earlier you wouldn't have to redo this... sorry :)

1000 more at 11e7 done.

[QUOTE=bsquared;201270]Arrgh, if I'd have posted a few minutes earlier you wouldn't have to redo this... sorry :)

1000 more at 11e7 done.[/QUOTE]

No problem - it's just typing the figures into an excel-file.

New total:

[CODE] 900 @ 1e6
3300 @ 11e6
2001 @ 40e6
1601 @ 43e6
1 @ 1e8
1845 @ 11e7[/CODE]

This equals to 645.5% of t45 = 114.2% of t50 = 18.4% of t55 = 2.73% of t60 (= 0.314% of t65 :wink: )

93 more curves at 11e7 done.

I have sent the current file for 4788 to Christophe Clavier. He says that it will not appear on his site until he next does an update.

[QUOTE=10metreh;201279]I have sent the current file for 4788 to Christophe Clavier. He says that it will not appear on his site until he next does an update.[/QUOTE]Thanks for that. I had been meaning to do that but kept forgetting....

[size="1"]I kept hoping we would hit the downdriver....[/size]