[QUOTE=jrk;197694]+150 curves @ B1=110000000, B2=1589211473866[/QUOTE]
I completed another 240 curves @ those limits. Still no factor.

The total curves done are about 1.8 * t50.

I have started an overnight run of p-1 (B1=1e10, B2=1e16, resuming from my yesterday's 1e10/1e15 run) a few hours ago, I guess it will finish around midnight (CET)

[QUOTE=fivemack;197768]with (14e, 30-bit lpa/lpr, alim=rlim=50e6)[/QUOTE]
I checked 29 vs 30 bit, 14e vs 15e and alim=rlim=25e6 vs 50e6 vs 75e6.

30 bit, 14e and alim=rlim=50e6 indeed appears to be the winner.

[QUOTE=jrk;197792]I do.

[code]n: 22315086009543699881696673140311700365075401903410041991888847307663799610560235574994125636703013521384678857814894314475474921423859163748271799984152025524899
# norm 1.050714e-15 alpha -7.337146 e 1.121e-12
skew: 25520528.70
c0: 31410679515197091100341643412427401243420
c1: 4180601981543089138092261003493340
c2: -2347505003114131780984812301
c3: -51235139041477161474
c4: 3624790086036
c5: 7560
Y0: -19679511428703587012905042402449
Y1: 492226961856379171
rlim: 50000000
alim: 50000000
lpbr: 30
lpba: 30
mfbr: 60
mfba: 60
rlambda: 2.6
alambda: 2.6[/code]


14e is faster.[/QUOTE]

Is everyone done poly searching then? I'll start on 10M-20M if so. Andi_47, I'll happily kill the jobs if you turn up a factor.

[QUOTE=bsquared;197802]Is everyone done poly searching then? I'll start on 10M-20M if so. Andi_47, I'll happily kill the jobs if you turn up a factor.[/QUOTE]

I have stopped poly searching, but not sure if Tom has.

[QUOTE=bsquared;197802]Andi_47, I'll happily kill the jobs if you turn up a factor.[/QUOTE]

It went a bit faster than I thought; no factor to B1=1e10, B2=1e16. I will extend to B2=3e16, ETA ~10:30 a.m. (CET) tomorrow. (i.e. ~12 hours from now)

I've stopped searching, and interrupted my ECM after about 3500@4e7; will take 20M-40M for the sieving.

[QUOTE=fivemack;197816]I've stopped searching, and interrupted my ECM after about 3500@4e7; will take 20M-40M for the sieving.[/QUOTE]

Tom, what range of Q should we sieve?

[QUOTE=10metreh;197875]Tom, what range of Q should we sieve?[/QUOTE]

I am not Tom, but,

It will take as much as 50e6 or 60e6 of Q (so since bsquared started at 10e6, end at 60e6 or 70e6) but my sieving test was limited so I may be a bit off.

[QUOTE=Andi47;197815]It went a bit faster than I thought; no factor to B1=1e10, B2=1e16. I will extend to B2=3e16, ETA ~10:30 a.m. (CET) tomorrow. (i.e. ~12 hours from now)[/QUOTE]

done, no factor.

Yield looks a bit under 2 relations per Q; we need a bit over 100 million relations, so say 10M - 70M for the range.